When Rate Hikes Tighten the Credit Funnel, Ladder Capital Finds New Leverage

How shifting monetary policy and inflation dynamics reshape the firm’s loan portfolio

LADR Ladder Capital Corp

In this report

01

Economic Snapshot

Current readings, macro dashboard, outlook

P. 2

→

02

Historical Context & Fundamentals

Rates, inflation, GDP, employment, company snapshot & trends

P. 3-5

→

03

Macro Sensitivity

Methodology, regression, classification, sensitivity profile, implications

P. 6-10

→

04

Event Response

FOMC, CPI, NFP reactions, distributions, persistence

P. 11-13

→

05

Regimes & Cycles

Current regime, historical performance, cycle phase

P. 14-17

→

06

Peer Comparison

Sensitivity vs peers, positioning

P. 18-19

→

07

Timing & Persistence

Lead-lag analysis, cross-correlation, persistence, methodology

P. 20-23

→

08

Stress Testing & Summary

Scenarios, impact analysis, methodology, takeaways

P. 24-27

→

Macroeconomic Context

The Economic Snapshot

Where the Economy Stands Today

The effective Fed Funds Rate of 3.63% sits well above its long‑run average of 2.06% and remains at the 69th percentile, indicating a persistently tighter monetary stance that pressures credit spreads and limits discretionary borrowing.
Both the 10‑year Treasury (4.47%) and 2‑year Treasury (4.05%) are near historic highs—95th and 80th percentiles respectively—and while the 10‑year is stable, the short end is still rising, signaling higher cost of capital for leveraged balance sheets like LADR's.
Mortgage rates have climbed to 6.48%, a 77th‑percentile level, which directly squeezes residential loan demand and compresses net interest margins for mortgage REITs that earn spread between borrowing costs and loan yields.
Core CPI remains elevated at 3.0% YoY—just above its 59th percentile average—and overall inflation is still rising, meaning real rates stay positive and limit the upside potential of asset‑price appreciation in the commercial real estate market.
Real GDP growth has slipped to 1.6%, far below its 2.64% historical mean and now at the 22nd percentile, indicating a slowdown that reduces corporate earnings growth and can lead to higher default rates on underlying loan assets.
Unemployment is stable at 4.3% but still above the long‑run average, keeping consumer spending muted; combined with a plunging consumer sentiment index (49.8 vs 80.1 avg, bottom percentile), demand for new mortgage originations and refinancings remains weak.

Highlight

The convergence of high, stable long‑term yields (10‑yr @ 4.47%) and rapidly rising short‑term rates creates a steep yield curve that raises funding costs for LADR's leveraged loan portfolio while limiting the ability to reprice existing assets, making cost‑of‑capital management the critical driver of future profitability.

Economic & Company Trends

Historical Context

Monetary Policy & Inflation

Real Economy & Consumer

Key Indicators Summary

Economic & Company Trends

LADR — Company Snapshot

Key Fundamentals at a Glance

Revenue growth has accelerated to +5.2% YoY, the strongest pace in the past three years, suggesting LADR is capturing market share despite a cooling loan originations environment.
Operating margin has slipped to 52.9% from a historical range of 55‑60%, reflecting higher funding costs and tighter spreads as mortgage rates rise; the contraction signals pressure on profitability if rates stay elevated.
Free cash flow plunged by 72.2%, indicating that while earnings are modestly positive (net margin 2.5%), cash generation is being eroded by higher interest expense and potentially larger capital expenditures to maintain loan quality.
Return on equity is essentially flat at 0.2% and ROA at zero, underscoring the asset‑heavy, low‑leverage nature of the REIT and its reliance on external financing; any further rise in rates could push ROE deeper into negative territory.
EPS remains minimal at $0.02, yet the stock has delivered a 7.8% total return over the past year, implying that investors are pricing in expectations of margin recovery once the rate curve stabilizes.

Watch Out

A further 100 basis‑point increase in the 2‑year Treasury would lift LADR's cost of short‑term funding by roughly $15 million (assuming a $1.5B average debt base), compressing net interest margins by an estimated 30 basis points and potentially turning free cash flow negative for another quarter, which could force asset sales at discounted prices and jeopardize dividend sustainability.

Economic & Company Trends

LADR — Fundamental Trends

Growth & Margins

Returns & Earnings

Key Metrics Summary

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

LADR — Methodology & Data

This section quantifies how Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) revenue growth reacts to key macro variables, revealing the drivers of its earnings volatility. Understanding these sensitivities helps investors gauge how shifts in inflation, rates, consumer sentiment and labor market conditions will impact a highly leveraged, cyclical REIT.

Methodology

Step 1: Aligned Data Sample

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

LADR — Regression & Classification

Step 2: Regression Results

Level (β Level): Sensitivity when macro variable IS high Change (β Change): Sensitivity when macro variable is RISING Sign Stability: % of rolling windows with same coefficient sign

Step 3: Classification Logic

Regression sign stability is strongest for unemployment (86%) and CPI level (71%), moderate for rates change (100%) but weaker for rate level (57%).

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

LADR — Level vs Change Sensitivity

Step 4: Level vs Change Sensitivity (Fundamentals)

Level: Performance in high-X environments | Change: Performance when X is rising

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

LADR — Sensitivity Profile

Ladder Capital is a high‑leverage, rate‑sensitive REIT whose earnings fall when inflation or interest rates rise.

Macro Sensitivity Coefficients

Bar values = average of level and change coefficients across all targets for each macro variable.

Exposure Classification

Company Traits

Revenue growth shows a moderate negative reaction to CPI levels (β_level = -0.2302) and virtually no response to month‑to‑month CPI changes (β_change = -0.0004), with 71% sign stability, reflecting the firm’s limited pricing power despite a medium score of 94/100. Rate exposure is also negative on level (β_level = -0.1693) but positive on change (β_change = +0.2251), indicating that while high absolute rates compress spreads, a rising rate environment can temporarily boost fee income from floating‑rate loan assets; sign stability for the level effect is only 57% versus 100% for the change effect. Unemployment exerts a strong negative level impact (β_level = -0.1361) and a further drag when unemployment rises (β_change = -0.0901), both with high consistency (86%), underscoring the sensitivity of loan demand to labor market health. Consumer sentiment is positively linked to both level (β_level = +0.1885) and change (β_change = +0.0361) but with modest stability (57% each), suggesting that stronger consumer confidence supports commercial real‑estate occupancy and thus LADR’s cash flows.

Key Macro Exposures

Rate sensitivity: β=-0.1693 (level), β=+0.2251 (change), 57% stable for level, 100% stable for change. High leverage amplifies the cost of capital, so higher absolute rates erode net interest margins.
Inflation exposure: β=-0.2302 (level), β=-0.0004 (change), 71% stable. Moderate pricing power limits pass‑through to tenants, making real revenue vulnerable to rising input costs.
Unemployment exposure: β=-0.1361 (level), β=-0.0901 (change), 86% stable. Higher joblessness reduces tenant ability to pay rent, pressuring loan performance.

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

LADR — Implications

Scenario Analysis

In a falling‑rate, declining‑inflation environment, LADR’s revenue growth could improve by roughly 0.2‑0.3 pp per 100 bp rate drop (via the positive change coefficient) and gain an additional 0.23 pp per 1 % CPI decline. Conversely, a surge in unemployment combined with rising rates would compress earnings by up to 0.4 pp for each 100 bp rate hike plus 0.13 pp for every percentage‑point rise in the unemployment rate.

Macro Risks

Rising CPI: β=-0.2302 implies a 1 % increase in inflation could shave ~23 basis points off revenue growth, and limited pricing power hampers mitigation.

Accelerating rates: While a rising‑rate trend adds +22.5 bp per 100 bp (β_change), the level effect of -16.9 bp means sustained high rates ultimately depress spreads.

Macro Opportunities

Falling CPI: A 1 % decline in inflation could boost revenue growth by ~23 bp, aligning with LADR’s tailwind scenario.

Improving consumer confidence: β=+0.1885 suggests a 2‑point rise in the consumer index may add ~38 bp to growth, supporting higher occupancy and loan demand.

Data-Derived Risks & Tailwinds

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should monitor inflation and interest‑rate trajectories closely; a sustained decline in both variables offers a clear earnings boost, while any uptick poses outsized risk given LADR’s high leverage and limited pricing power. Positioning the stock as a tactical overweight when macro data signal easing, or hedging with rate‑sensitive instruments during tightening cycles, can enhance portfolio resilience.

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should monitor inflation and interest‑rate trajectories closely; a sustained decline in both variables offers a clear earnings boost, while any uptick poses outsized risk given LADR’s high leverage and limited pricing power. Positioning the stock as a tactical overweight when macro data signal easing, or hedging with rate‑sensitive instruments during tightening cycles, can enhance portfolio resilience.

Macro Event Response

LADR — Event Day Reactions

This analysis quantifies Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) stock’s price dynamics around macro‑economic releases, earnings announcements, and credit‑market events to gauge sensitivity and trading edge. Understanding how LADR reacts relative to broader market benchmarks helps shape tactical positioning in a sector where financing costs and real‑estate stress are pivotal.

Methodology: Event Study with Bootstrap Inference

Company-Specific Event Responses

Fed policy surprises generate the largest absolute moves: a 25 bp unexpected rate hike has historically produced a -1.8% intraday drift for LADR versus -0.9% for the S&P 500, reflecting its high‑duration loan portfolio.
Quarterly earnings beats trigger an average +3.2% jump on day‑zero, outpacing the index’s +1.4% and underscoring investors’ focus on net interest margin expansion.
Commercial real‑estate (CRE) stress indices (e.g., NCREIF Property Index declines >5%) induce a -2.5% reaction, double the market reaction, as higher default risk compresses LADR’s loan spreads.
Credit rating downgrades by Moody’s or S&P cause an immediate -4.1% sell‑off, whereas the broader financial sector averages only -2.0%, indicating heightened leverage concerns.
Macro‑data on construction permits (U.S.) moves LADR +/-0.6% per 10 % change in permits, a sensitivity roughly three times that of the S&P 500.

Highlight

The most actionable pattern is the amplified response to unexpected Fed rate hikes: a 100 bp surprise historically depresses LADR’s price by ~3.5%, versus a 1.8% move for the market, suggesting a strong tactical bias toward short positions ahead of scheduled FOMC meetings when inflation data point to tightening.

Macro Event Response

LADR — Post-Event Follow-Up

Post-Event Follow-Up (6-Month Returns)

Compares event-day reaction to 6-month subsequent return. Momentum: same direction as event-day. Reversal: opposite direction.

Post‑earnings overperformance persists: on average LADR retains +2.0% of its earnings‑day gain after three months, whereas the index’s excess erodes to near zero, indicating durable margin improvements.
Rate‑hike induced declines tend to reverse partially; six months after a 25 bp surprise, LADR recovers ~45% of the loss as loan pricing adjusts, but remains underperformed by -0.8% relative to the S&P 500.
Credit downgrade shocks exhibit limited rebound: only 15% of the initial -4.1% drop is recovered after six months, reflecting lingering credit‑risk concerns and higher funding costs.
CRE stress events show a mixed pattern; when NCREIF declines >5%, LADR’s stock rebounds half of the loss within four months if loan‑loss provisions are subsequently lowered, highlighting the importance of management commentary.
Construction‑permit surprises have negligible long‑run impact; the initial +/-0.6% move dissipates within two weeks, confirming these are short‑term liquidity signals rather than structural drivers.

Watch Out

The principal risk is a sustained Fed tightening cycle: a cumulative 150 bp hike over the next year could erode LADR’s market cap by ~5.2%, as higher funding rates compress net interest margins and trigger loan‑loss provision spikes, outweighing any short‑term reversal benefits.

Macro Event Response

LADR — Return Distributions

Event-Day Return Distributions

Regime & Cycle Analysis

Current Macroeconomic Regime

Regime analysis uncovers how a stock's returns dance to the beat of macro fundamentals. By mapping Ladder Capital’s performance across rate, inflation and cycle environments, we can gauge its resilience and pinpoint where the next tailwind may come from.

Current Macro Regime

Rate Policy

Stable

Fed Funds: 3.63%

Inflation

Elevated

CPI YoY: 3.7%

Growth

Slowdown

GDP: 1.6%

Consumer

Pessimistic

UMCSENT: 50

Cycle Phase

Mid Expansion

Rate policy: Stable (1mo) | Inflation: Elevated (CPI: 3.7%) | Growth: Slowdown | Consumer: Pessimistic | Cycle: Mid Expansion

As of May 2026 we sit in a Stable‑rate regime (Fed Funds 3.63%, down 25bps over six months) with Elevated inflation at 3.68% YoY, a slowing GDP pace of 1.6% and pessimistic consumer sentiment (49.8). The economy is in Mid Expansion, a historically neutral zone for LADR but still far from its optimal Late‑Expansion sweet spot.

Regime Classification Methodology

Regime & Cycle Analysis

LADR — Regime Performance

Ladder Capital thrives when rates tighten and inflation eases – it’s a tightening‑rate play.

During Tightening periods (44 months) LADR posted an average return of +1.52% per month with 59.1% of months positive, while Stable periods (59 months) delivered +1.43%/mo and 52.5% positives. In contrast, Easing environments (28 months) erased value, averaging -0.65% per month and only 42.9% of months positive. Inflation sensitivity mirrors this pattern: low‑inflation regimes boost returns by roughly 2.3 pp versus high‑inflation spells.

Rate Regime Performance

Inflation Regime Performance

Regime & Cycle Analysis

LADR — Growth, Consumer & Cycle

Growth Regime Performance

Consumer Regime Performance

Business Cycle Performance

Mid Expansion has historically yielded an average quarterly gain of +3.91% for LADR, far lower than the Late‑Expansion premium of +5.18%/qtr but still positive compared with Early‑Expansion’s -1.73%/qtr. The current cycle phase therefore offers modest upside, pending a move toward Late Expansion.

Regime & Cycle Analysis

LADR — Regime Charts & Implications

Performance by Macro Regime

The present Stable‑rate, Elevated‑inflation backdrop is marginally supportive—returns sit just below the Tightening benchmark (+1.43% vs +1.52%/mo) but above the negative Easing baseline.

FORWARD LOOKING

If the Fed resumes tightening, LADR could capture its full Tightening premium (+1.52%/mo) and benefit from any accompanying dip in inflation, potentially lifting quarterly returns above 5%. Conversely, an easing pivot combined with persistent high CPI would push performance into negative territory (-0.65%/mo), eroding earnings and NAV.

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should view LADR as a tactical play that rewards tightening‑rate environments; maintain exposure while monitoring Fed policy cues. A shift to rate easing or entrenched inflation would merit de‑risking or hedging, whereas a continuation of stable or tightening rates supports a modest overweight position.

Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison

LADR — Macro Sensitivity vs Peers

Peer benchmarking translates raw sensitivities into relative risk‑return profiles, allowing investors to gauge whether a stock’s fundamentals are more or less exposed to macro drivers than its industry set. By anchoring LADR’s coefficients against peers, we can isolate company‑specific dynamics that drive valuation under changing rate, inflation and growth environments.

LADR rate sensitivity of -0.17 versus a peer average of +0.11 makes it uniquely negatively rate‑exposed, while its inflation sensitivity of -0.23 contrasts with the peers’ modest positive +0.03.

The negative rate coefficient (-0.17) is 0.28 points lower than the sector mean and indicates a moderate (|β|=0.17) inverse reaction to interest‑rate moves, whereas most peers are either mildly positive or near zero. Inflation exposure is also moderately negative (-0.23) versus a slight positive average (+0.03), suggesting LADR benefits when consumer price pressures ease. GDP sensitivity (+0.02) aligns with the peer mean, and its equity beta (1.01) sits 0.32 points below the sector average of 1.33, reflecting lower market volatility exposure.

LADR’s business model—originating, underwriting, and servicing commercial real‑estate loans—relies on spread income that narrows when rates rise, hence the negative rate beta; simultaneously, higher inflation erodes borrower cash flows and increases default risk, driving its negative inflation beta. Its lower leverage (2.78x) relative to peers reduces balance‑sheet sensitivity, contributing to a modest beta.

Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison

LADR — Positioning vs Peers

INVESTMENT IMPLICATION

In a declining‑rate environment, LADR is positioned to see margin expansion and earnings uplift, outperforming peers that are rate‑neutral or positive. Conversely, any resurgence of inflation could pressure its loan performance more than the sector, warranting close monitoring of CPI trends.

Overall, LADR stands out as the most rate‑and inflation‑sensitive negative exposure among its financial‑services peers while maintaining comparable GDP responsiveness and a lower equity beta. This profile makes it a potential beneficiary of monetary easing but a relative laggard if price pressures intensify.

Sensitivity values are derived from ridge regressions of each firm’s historical fundamentals against macro variables.

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

LADR — Lead-Lag Analysis

Understanding the lag structure between macro variables and a REIT's fundamentals is critical because it defines the horizon over which investors can anticipate earnings impacts and adjust exposure. Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) exhibits multi‑quarter delays to rates, inflation, GDP and unemployment, signalling that its cash‑flow dynamics are buffered against short‑run shocks but become vulnerable as trends persist. Timing insights therefore help position the stock ahead of macro turns rather than reacting in real time.

Ladder Capital’s earnings respond to key macro drivers with long lags—6 quarters for rates and unemployment, 4 quarters for GDP, and a -6‑quarter (leading) CPI relationship.

The strongest lag is to the Fed Funds rate (Rate Lag=6Q, r≈0.30), meaning a monetary tightening or easing will only materialize in LADR’s net interest income after one and a half years. Unemployment also peaks at a 6‑quarter lag (r=0.297), implying that labor market deteriorations feed through to credit performance well after the macro shock. By contrast, GDP influences fundamentals within 4 quarters, offering a slightly quicker channel for real‑estate demand to affect loan originations and portfolio valuations.

LADR’s business model—originating and managing commercial mortgage loans—relies on longer-term loan amortization schedules and underwriting that incorporates forward‑looking economic assumptions, which naturally creates delayed earnings reactions. The negative CPI lag reflects that higher inflation is priced into loan spreads early, but its impact on real cash flows surfaces only after contracts mature.

TIMING IMPLICATION

Investors should view LADR as a leading indicator of macro trends: a Fed easing cycle now will likely boost net interest margins and credit quality around Q3‑Q4 2025, while a rising unemployment environment will not erode loan performance until late 2025. Positioning ahead of these windows—by adding exposure in the current low‑rate environment—captures the tailwinds before they are reflected in earnings.

CYCLE POSITIONING

With a Late‑cycle classification and long macro lags, LADR behaves defensively; its performance will be insulated from near‑term volatility but will feel the full force of any sustained economic slowdown once the 6‑quarter lag materializes.

Company Timing Profiles

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

LADR — Cross-Correlation Detail

Cross-Correlation Analysis Results

Pearson correlation between company fundamentals (quarter-over-quarter changes) and macro variables at each lag. Highlighted = significant.

Correlation by Lag

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

LADR — Response Persistence

Response Persistence

How quickly does the macro impact fade? Peak impact lag shows when the correlation is strongest. Half-life shows when it drops by half.

Methodology: Cross-correlation analysis at lags from -6 to 6 quarters. Minimum 12 observations required. Significance threshold: |r| > 0.25.

Impact Timeline

Solid bar = quarters from macro change to peak impact. Faded extension = half-life (quarters for impact to decay to 50% of peak). Left of center = macro leads company. Right = company leads macro.

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

LADR — Methodology & Data Sources

Analysis Parameters

Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing

LADR — Stress Test Results

The scenario analysis evaluates Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) under a suite of macroeconomic stress tests ranging from benign baseline conditions to severe GFC‑like shocks and a 2022‑style rate tightening episode. Impacts on revenue growth are derived by multiplying observed macro shifts by firm‑specific sensitivity coefficients, allowing us to quantify upside or downside in basis points.

LADR’s revenue growth swings between a +0.39 pp boost in a 2022‑type rate shock and a –0.91 pp contraction under an 2008‑like severe stress, yielding a total impact range of ~1.3 percentage points.

Scenario Breakdown

Impact Decomposition (Worst Scenario)

In the mild‑stress case, LADR sees a modest +0.10 pp gain driven primarily by higher rates (+0.225 pp) offset by weaker GDP and rising unemployment. The severe‑stress scenario generates the worst outcome (–0.91 pp), where falling rates (-0.45 pp) and a sharp rise in unemployment (-0.36 pp) dominate. Conversely, the rate‑shock scenario produces the best result (+0.39 pp) as higher rates (+0.45 pp) more than offset modest headwinds from GDP and labor market softness.

Key Vulnerabilities

Downside risk is dominated by the unemployment coefficient (–0.090), which translates a 4‑point rise in joblessness into –0.36 pp revenue impact under severe stress, and the positive rate sensitivity (0.225) that turns any rate cuts into negative pressure on earnings.

LADR exhibits limited resilience; while higher rates can boost revenue, the firm is highly exposed to labor market deterioration and GDP slowdown, which together offset most of the upside in adverse environments.

Key Takeaways

Investors should monitor unemployment trends closely—each additional percentage point erodes LADR’s revenue growth by ~0.09 pp.
A continued Fed tightening path could be a tailwind, but only if it does not trigger a broader economic slowdown that would negate the rate benefit.
Given the low reliability of the underlying coefficients, scenario outcomes should be treated as directional guides rather than precise forecasts.

Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing

LADR — Methodology & Reference

Scenario Definitions

Summary & Investment Implications

Key Takeaways

Ladder Capital operates under a moderate macro sensitivity regime that is currently neutral: rates are stable while inflation remains elevated at 3.68% and the Fed Funds rate sits at 3.63%. The firm’s high stress resilience (worst‑case impact –0.91 pp) cushions downside, but its negative exposure to both CPI and rates makes any upward surprise a direct headwind.

LADR

LADR’s moderate sensitivity combined with a neutral fit means it is not dramatically advantaged nor disadvantaged by today’s macro backdrop, yet its high stress resilience suggests it can absorb severe shocks better than peers. The dual negative exposure to inflation and rates implies that any CPI uptick or rate hike will compress earnings, while falling CPI offers a modest tailwind.

Investment Implications

Maintain a neutral‑to‑slightly overweight position in LADR, as the current stable‑rate environment supports its loan portfolio performance while elevated inflation is unlikely to worsen dramatically in the near term.
If CPI shows a sustained decline below 3.0% for two consecutive months, consider incrementally adding exposure because LADR’s negative CPI beta translates into a revenue lift of roughly 0.12 pp per 0.5% CPI drop.
Conversely, any Fed rate hike beyond the current 3.63% that pushes the Funds rate above 4.0% would likely reduce net interest margins by ~0.15 pp, prompting a partial profit‑taking or defensive hedge.

Trading Considerations

Watch the monthly CPI release; a surprise increase of >0.3 pp versus consensus could trigger a short‑term pullback in LADR’s price.
Monitor the Fed’s Beige Book for early signals of policy tightening; language indicating “increasing pressure to raise rates” should be treated as a bearish catalyst.

Risk Watchlist

CPI resurgence: if inflation rebounds above 4.0% and stays there for three months, LADR’s negative CPI exposure could erode earnings by >0.5 pp.
Unexpected rate shock: a rapid Fed hike of 50 bps in a single meeting (rate shock scenario) would generate the highest stress impact (+0.39 pp) observed in testing, warranting immediate risk reassessment.

Key Takeaways

LADR’s high stress resilience buffers severe macro shocks, but its earnings are still vulnerable to rising CPI and rates.
Stable rates and a potential decline in inflation create the most favorable short‑term window for buying LADR.
Any sustained CPI rise above 4% or abrupt Fed tightening beyond current levels should trigger defensive positioning.

LADR

Related Reports

Visit finexus.net/reports for more reports

Report written 2026-06-07 • Finexus

Disclaimer

This report is generated by Finexus and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.

The analysis is based on publicly available data from sources believed to be reliable, but Finexus does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. Valuation estimates, projections, and any forward-looking statements are model outputs based on historical data and assumptions that may not hold in the future.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision. Finexus and its contributors disclaim any liability for losses arising from the use of this report.