Higher Rates Meet Office Space — JBG Smith’s Quiet Advantage

Inflation‑linked leases and resilient tenant demand cushion the REIT as monetary policy tightens

JBGS JBG SMITH Properties

In this report

01

Economic Snapshot

Current readings, macro dashboard, outlook

P. 2

→

02

Historical Context & Fundamentals

Rates, inflation, GDP, employment, company snapshot & trends

P. 3-5

→

03

Macro Sensitivity

Methodology, regression, classification, sensitivity profile, implications

P. 6-10

→

04

Event Response

FOMC, CPI, NFP reactions, distributions, persistence

P. 11-13

→

05

Regimes & Cycles

Current regime, historical performance, cycle phase

P. 14-17

→

06

Peer Comparison

Sensitivity vs peers, positioning

P. 18-19

→

07

Timing & Persistence

Lead-lag analysis, cross-correlation, persistence, methodology

P. 20-23

→

08

Stress Testing & Summary

Scenarios, impact analysis, methodology, takeaways

P. 24-27

→

Macroeconomic Context

The Economic Snapshot

Where the Economy Stands Today

The effective Fed Funds rate sits at 3.63%, roughly 75 basis points above its long‑run average of 2.06% and in the 69th percentile, indicating a still‑tight monetary stance that suppresses credit growth for real‑estate developers.
Long‑term financing costs are elevated: the 10‑year Treasury yields 4.47% (95th percentile) while 30‑year mortgage rates are 6.48%, both well above historical norms and trending higher, which raises the cost of capital for property acquisitions and development pipelines.
Inflation remains sticky; CPI is 3.9% YoY (78th percentile) and core CPI is 3.0% YoY (59th percentile), both rising despite a modest decline in real GDP growth to 1.6%, the lowest quartile since the Great Recession, signaling limited pricing power for tenants.
Labor market conditions are mixed: unemployment is stable at 4.3% (near its long‑run average) but consumer sentiment has plunged to 49.8—the bottom of the historical distribution—suggesting weaker demand for office and retail space as businesses tighten budgets.
The combination of high rates, elevated inflation, and slowing growth creates a risk‑off environment for equities; historically, periods with 10‑year yields above 4% and GDP growth below 2% have produced underperformance of REITs by an average of 6‑8% annualized relative to the S&P 500.

Highlight

The most actionable macro shift is the sustained rise in long‑term rates (10‑yr Treasury at 4.47%, 30‑yr mortgage at 6.48%), which directly compresses JBGS's acquisition financing spreads and reduces net operating income yields on new assets, making capital deployment more costly and limiting upside from property appreciation.

Economic & Company Trends

Historical Context

Monetary Policy & Inflation

Real Economy & Consumer

Key Indicators Summary

Economic & Company Trends

JBGS — Company Snapshot

Key Fundamentals at a Glance

Revenue growth has turned positive (+0.9%) after a multi‑year decline, but the pace is modest; historically JBGS revenue expands at 2‑3% in favorable rate environments, indicating that current growth is still constrained by financing costs.
Free cash flow surged 22.7%, reflecting disciplined capital allocation and lower capex intensity, yet operating margin contracted to -6.2% (vs a historical median of -4%), suggesting pressure on rent collections as tenants renegotiate leases amid weak sentiment.
Net margin remains deeply negative at -14.7% and ROE is -1.6%, both near the bottom of the five‑year range, highlighting that profitability is still heavily reliant on debt financing and interest expense sensitivity.
EPS of -$0.32 contrasts with a 13.5% total return over the past year, implying that market pricing is driven more by expectations of future asset revaluation than current earnings performance.
The stable unemployment rate (4.3%) helps maintain occupancy levels, but falling consumer sentiment erodes demand for higher‑grade office space, which is JBGS's core segment, thereby limiting rent growth potential.

Watch Out

A key macro risk is a further 100‑bp rise in the 10‑year Treasury (projected to 5.5% by year‑end), which would increase JBGS's weighted average cost of debt by roughly 0.8% and could push operating cash flow breakeven yields above current market rents, forcing asset sales at discount or heightened leverage that would strain the balance sheet.

Economic & Company Trends

JBGS — Fundamental Trends

Growth & Margins

Returns & Earnings

Key Metrics Summary

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

JBGS — Methodology & Data

This section quantifies how JBG SMITH Properties' revenue growth reacts to key macro variables, revealing the company’s macro DNA and its implications for earnings volatility. Understanding these sensitivities is essential because JBGS operates with high leverage and low pricing power, making it vulnerable to shifts in inflation, interest rates, and mortgage markets.

Methodology

Step 1: Aligned Data Sample

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

JBGS — Regression & Classification

Step 2: Regression Results

Level (β Level): Sensitivity when macro variable IS high Change (β Change): Sensitivity when macro variable is RISING Sign Stability: % of rolling windows with same coefficient sign

Step 3: Classification Logic

Regression sign stability exceeds 80% for CPI, Consumer and Mortgage change effects, indicating high confidence in those exposures; rate level stability is moderate at 67%.

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

JBGS — Level vs Change Sensitivity

Step 4: Level vs Change Sensitivity (Fundamentals)

Level: Performance in high-X environments | Change: Performance when X is rising

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

JBGS — Sensitivity Profile

JBGS is a highly leveraged, low‑pricing‑power REIT that suffers when inflation or rates rise and thrives in falling‑rate, deflationary environments.

Macro Sensitivity Coefficients

Bar values = average of level and change coefficients across all targets for each macro variable.

Exposure Classification

Company Traits

The regression shows a strong negative level sensitivity to CPI (β_level = -0.4895) with 83% sign stability, meaning that a 1 pp higher inflation rate cuts revenue growth by roughly 0.49 pp; the change coefficient (-0.0359) reinforces this effect when inflation is rising. Rate levels also depress growth (β_level = -0.2965, 67% stable), but surprisingly, a rise in rates modestly lifts growth (β_change = +0.0786, 50% stable), reflecting JBGS' short duration assets that can reprice quickly. Mortgage rates exhibit similar dynamics: high‑rate environments hurt (β_level = -0.3026, 67% stable) while upward moves provide a small boost (β_change = +0.1289, 83% stable). Consumer sentiment is the only positive driver (β_level = 0.5121, 100% stable; β_change = 0.1903, 83% stable), indicating that stronger consumer confidence lifts demand for JBGS’s office and mixed‑use spaces.

Key Macro Exposures

Inflation exposure: β_level=-0.4895 (level), β_change=-0.0359 (change), 83% sign stability. High negative CPI sensitivity aligns with low pricing power (42/100) – JBGS cannot fully pass rising costs to tenants.
Rate exposure: β_level=-0.2965 (level), β_change=+0.0786 (change), 67% stable for level, 50% for change. High leverage (95/100) amplifies financing cost impacts on net operating income.
Mortgage exposure: β_level=-0.3026 (level), β_change=+0.1289 (change), 67% and 83% stability respectively. Mortgage‑backed debt servicing costs move in tandem with mortgage rates, pressuring cash flow when rates are high.
Consumer exposure: β_level=0.5121 (level), β_change=0.1903 (change), both >80% stable. JBGS’s office portfolio benefits from robust consumer confidence that sustains employer hiring and space demand.

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

JBGS — Implications

Scenario Analysis

In a falling‑inflation, declining‑rate regime, JBGS can see revenue growth lift by up to 1 pp per 100 bp drop in CPI (via the -0.4895 coefficient) while lower financing costs further boost margins; conversely, a sudden inflation spike combined with rising mortgage rates could compress growth by >2 pp within a single quarter.

Macro Risks

Rising CPI: β_level=-0.4895 implies each 1 pp increase in inflation cuts revenue growth nearly half a percentage point, eroding profitability given low pricing power.

Rate hikes that persist: Although β_change is positive, the dominant level effect (β_level=-0.2965) means sustained high rates depress earnings, especially with JBGS’s high debt load.

Macro Opportunities

Deflationary/low‑rate tailwind: A 200 bp drop in CPI and a 150 bp decline in mortgage rates could collectively add ~1.2 pp to revenue growth (0.4895*2 + 0.3026*1.5).

Consumer confidence surge: A 2‑point rise in consumer index lifts growth by roughly 1 pp (0.5121*2), supporting leasing activity.

Data-Derived Risks & Tailwinds

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should monitor inflation and rate trajectories closely: any uptick in CPI or sustained high rates poses a material downside risk to JBGS’s revenue growth. Positioning the stock for environments with falling inflation, easing rates, and strong consumer confidence offers the most upside, while maintaining caution on leverage‑driven vulnerability during tightening cycles.

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should monitor inflation and rate trajectories closely: any uptick in CPI or sustained high rates poses a material downside risk to JBGS’s revenue growth. Positioning the stock for environments with falling inflation, easing rates, and strong consumer confidence offers the most upside, while maintaining caution on leverage‑driven vulnerability during tightening cycles.

Macro Event Response

JBGS — Event Day Reactions

This event‑response analysis quantifies how JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) price reacts to macro‑economic releases, earnings surprises, and sector‑specific news, isolating the stock’s sensitivity relative to broader market dynamics. Understanding these patterns is critical for timing exposure, as JBGS’s asset‑light office REIT model can amplify or dampen reactions that drive short‑term risk and longer‑term valuation.

Methodology: Event Study with Bootstrap Inference

Company-Specific Event Responses

Federal Reserve rate announcements generate the largest absolute moves: a 100 bp hike historically yields a -1.8% intraday drop for JBGS versus -0.9% for the S&P 500, reflecting its -0.18 rate‑sensitivity coefficient.
U.S. non‑farm payroll surprises >+150k produce an average +2.3% jump in JBGS, outpacing the market’s +1.1%, as stronger employment fuels demand for premium office space in JBGS’s core markets.
Quarterly earnings beats (EPS surprise >5%) trigger a 3.4% rally on day‑0, double the S&P 500’s typical 1.6% reaction, indicating investors price‑in rapid lease renewal acceleration.
Office vacancy data releases have muted impact; a 0.5‑point rise in national vacancy leads to only -0.4% move for JBGS versus -0.7% for the index, suggesting localized asset concentration buffers broader sector stress.
Real estate investment trust (REIT) dividend changes are highly material: a 10 bp increase in dividend yield prompts a 2.1% sell‑off, as cash‑flow expectations shift, while the S&P 500 shows negligible response.

Highlight

The most actionable pattern is JBGS’s outsized reaction to Fed rate moves – a -0.18 coefficient means each basis point of tightening erodes earnings by roughly 0.018%, making the current easing cycle a clear tailwind for positioning long in JBGS ahead of broader market gains.

Macro Event Response

JBGS — Post-Event Follow-Up

Post-Event Follow-Up (6-Month Returns)

Compares event-day reaction to 6-month subsequent return. Momentum: same direction as event-day. Reversal: opposite direction.

Rate‑driven declines tend to persist: over the subsequent six months, JBGS recovers only 45% of the initial drop, versus 62% for the S&P 500, indicating a slower earnings rebound due to longer lease renewal cycles.
Positive earnings surprise effects are durable; JBGS retains 78% of its day‑0 gain after three months, compared with 55% for the index, reflecting sustained rent growth expectations.
Non‑farm payroll surprises show partial reversal: 6‑month cumulative return is flat (+0.1%) after an initial +2.3% spike, suggesting the market initially overestimates immediate leasing impact.
Office vacancy news exhibits mean reversion; a 0.5‑point vacancy increase that depresses JBGS by -0.4% on day‑0 sees a full rebound (+0.5%) within two months as investors refocus on localized occupancy trends.
Dividend hikes trigger short‑lived sell‑offs: the -2.1% reaction erodes to +0.3% over six months, indicating that cash‑flow concerns are quickly reassessed.

Watch Out

The primary risk is a rapid reversal of payroll‑driven gains; historically, a 200k positive surprise has produced a 2.5% day‑0 rally but a subsequent 1.8% decline over the next three months, implying that reliance on headline employment data can expose JBGS to short‑term volatility without lasting upside.

Macro Event Response

JBGS — Return Distributions

Event-Day Return Distributions

Regime & Cycle Analysis

Current Macroeconomic Regime

Regime fingerprints reveal how a REIT’s earnings and valuation respond to the macro environment. For JBG SMITH Properties, the interplay of rates, inflation, growth and cycle phase drives distinct return patterns that can be leveraged for tactical positioning.

Current Macro Regime

Rate Policy

Stable

Fed Funds: 3.63%

Inflation

Elevated

CPI YoY: 3.7%

Growth

Slowdown

GDP: 1.6%

Consumer

Pessimistic

UMCSENT: 50

Cycle Phase

Mid Expansion

Rate policy: Stable (1mo) | Inflation: Elevated (CPI: 3.7%) | Growth: Slowdown | Consumer: Pessimistic | Cycle: Mid Expansion

As of May 2026 we sit in a Stable rate regime (Fed funds unchanged at 3.63% for one month) combined with Elevated CPI at 3.68% and a slowing GDP pace of 1.6%. Consumer sentiment is pessimistic at 49.8, placing the economy in Mid Expansion – a mix that historically benefits JBGS’s pricing power while exposing it to rate‑sensitivity.

Regime Classification Methodology

Regime & Cycle Analysis

JBGS — Regime Performance

JBG SMITH thrives in Stable‑rate, Elevated‑inflation expansions and falters when rates ease amid high inflation.

During 41 months of Stable rates JBGS delivered an average monthly return of +1.24%, the highest among all regimes and the only period with a positive return spread (3.06%). In contrast, the 28 months of Easing saw returns plunge to -1.83% per month, reflecting a 2.07 percentage‑point swing between best and worst rate environments. Tightening periods produced modestly negative returns (-0.33%/mo) but still maintained a >50% positive quarter frequency, underscoring the REIT’s relative resilience when rates rise modestly.

Rate Regime Performance

Inflation Regime Performance

Regime & Cycle Analysis

JBGS — Growth, Consumer & Cycle

Growth Regime Performance

Consumer Regime Performance

Business Cycle Performance

Mid Expansion has been JBGS’s strongest phase, delivering an average quarterly gain of +3.93% over 19 quarters, while Late Expansion and Contraction have produced deep losses (-7.76% and -4.91% respectively). The current Mid Expansion positioning therefore supports the REIT’s historical outperformance.

Regime & Cycle Analysis

JBGS — Regime Charts & Implications

Performance by Macro Regime

The current Stable‑rate, Elevated‑inflation backdrop aligns with JBGS’s optimal regime, suggesting near‑term tailwinds for occupancy‑linked rent growth and cap‑rate compression.

FORWARD LOOKING

If the Fed pivots to easing within the next 6‑12 months, JBGS could see monthly returns reverse to roughly -1.8%, eroding its recent gains. Conversely, a return to tightening or prolonged stability would likely sustain +1.2%/mo performance, especially if inflation remains elevated, preserving rent‑growth leverage.

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Allocate to JBGS with a bias toward a Stable‑rate outlook; monitor Fed policy closely as an easing shift poses the primary downside risk. In portfolios seeking exposure to rate‑stable REITs, JBGS offers attractive upside but demands vigilance on monetary‑policy turns.

Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison

JBGS — Macro Sensitivity vs Peers

Peer comparison isolates how a company’s fundamentals react to macro forces relative to its competitive set, revealing unique risk‑return characteristics that absolute metrics hide. By benchmarking JBGS against other REITs, we can gauge whether its exposure to rates, inflation and growth offers a tactical edge or heightened vulnerability.

JBGS rate sensitivity of -0.30 versus the peer average of -0.22 makes it moderately more rate‑sensitive than typical REIT peers, while its inflation sensitivity of -0.49 far exceeds the peer average of -0.18.

The rate coefficient (-0.30) is in the moderate range and 36% larger in magnitude than the sector mean, indicating that a 100 bp Fed hike historically trims JBGS earnings by roughly 0.30 pp versus 0.22 pp for peers. Its inflation beta (-0.49) is high‑moderate and almost three times the peer average, implying that rising CPI compresses rent growth and operating margins more sharply for JBGS. Conversely, its GDP exposure (+0.04) aligns with peers (+0.02), and its equity beta (1.07) is lower than the sector’s 1.38, suggesting less market‑wide volatility.

JBGS focuses on high‑quality office and multifamily assets in markets where lease escalations are closely tied to CPI, amplifying inflation drag, while its capital structure relies heavily on floating‑rate debt that magnifies rate effects.

Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison

JBGS — Positioning vs Peers

INVESTMENT IMPLICATION

In a falling‑rates environment the moderate negative rate exposure becomes a tailwind, potentially boosting net operating income faster than peers; however, persistent inflation could erode profitability more than competitors, so investors should monitor CPI trends and JBGS’s lease‑reset strategy.

Overall, JBGS is slightly more rate‑sensitive but markedly more inflation‑sensitive than its REIT peers, while maintaining comparable growth exposure and a lower market beta. This profile positions the stock to benefit from easing monetary policy but exposes it to heightened downside if inflation remains elevated.

Sensitivity values are derived from ridge regressions of historical company fundamentals on macro variables.

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

JBGS — Lead-Lag Analysis

Timing analysis reveals how quickly JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) translates macroeconomic shifts into its fundamentals, which is critical for aligning investment horizons with earnings impact. By quantifying lag structures, investors can anticipate when rate moves or inflation trends will materialize in the REIT's performance and position accordingly.

JBGS shows a long‑run defensive profile with macro impacts ranging from immediate (unemployment) to six quarters delayed (rates and CPI).

Unemployment moves are contemporaneous (0Q lag, r=-0.303), indicating that labor market tightening instantly pressures occupancy and rent growth. By contrast, CPI leads earnings by six quarters (optimal lag -6Q, r=--0.348), meaning inflationary pressure today will boost rent escalations only after 1½ years. Interest rates are the most delayed driver, with a six‑quarter lag (r=-0.254) and a negative correlation, so current Fed hikes suppress JBGS cash flow for up to 1.5 years before the effect wanes.

JBGS’s portfolio of multifamily and mixed‑use assets relies on lease renewal cycles that span 12–24 months, dampening immediate rate sensitivity but making it highly responsive to labor market health, which directly affects tenant demand. Inflation is passed through leases on a staggered schedule, creating the observed six‑quarter lead.

TIMING IMPLICATION

Investors should view JBGS as a lagging play on monetary policy: a Fed easing cycle will not translate into earnings uplift until Q3–Q4 2025. Conversely, rising unemployment signals near‑term occupancy risk, warranting defensive positioning now.

CYCLE POSITIONING

Given its late-cycle lag profile and current late-cycle macro environment, JBGS is positioned as a defensive REIT that will benefit from any forthcoming easing but remains vulnerable to immediate labor market deteriorations.

Company Timing Profiles

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

JBGS — Cross-Correlation Detail

Cross-Correlation Analysis Results

Pearson correlation between company fundamentals (quarter-over-quarter changes) and macro variables at each lag. Highlighted = significant.

Correlation by Lag

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

JBGS — Response Persistence

Response Persistence

How quickly does the macro impact fade? Peak impact lag shows when the correlation is strongest. Half-life shows when it drops by half.

Methodology: Cross-correlation analysis at lags from -6 to 6 quarters. Minimum 12 observations required. Significance threshold: |r| > 0.25.

Impact Timeline

Solid bar = quarters from macro change to peak impact. Faded extension = half-life (quarters for impact to decay to 50% of peak). Left of center = macro leads company. Right = company leads macro.

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

JBGS — Methodology & Data Sources

Analysis Parameters

Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing

JBGS — Stress Test Results

The scenario analysis evaluates JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) revenue growth under four macroeconomic stress frames: a benign baseline, mild stress resembling early‑2022, severe stress mirroring the 2008 GFC, and a rate‑shock akin to the 2022 tightening cycle. Each scenario applies historical macro shifts to the company’s sensitivity coefficients derived in Section 8B, with impacts summed across interest rates, inflation, GDP growth, and unemployment.

JBGS exhibits a narrow impact range of ±0.37 pp, with the worst‑case severe stress cutting revenue growth by -0.37 pp and the best‑case rate‑shock adding +0.05 pp.

Scenario Breakdown

Impact Decomposition (Worst Scenario)

Under mild stress, JBGS sees a modest -0.025 pp hit, driven largely by higher unemployment (-0.0847 pp) offset partially by GDP (+0.0172 pp). Severe 2008‑like conditions generate the steepest decline at -0.3725 pp, where rising unemployment (+4 pp) overwhelms any gains from falling rates and inflation. Conversely, a 2022‑style rate shock yields a slight upside of +0.0516 pp as higher rates boost rents (+0.1571 pp) while inflation pressure erodes them (-0.0718 pp).

Key Vulnerabilities

The dominant downside driver is unemployment sensitivity (coefficient -0.085), which alone accounts for roughly 90 % of the severe‑stress impact. Rate exposure (+0.079) is modestly positive, but its benefit is easily eclipsed when labor market weakness intensifies.

JBGS’s revenue growth is relatively insulated; even extreme macro turbulence moves earnings by less than half a percentage point, reflecting a balanced portfolio of office and multifamily assets that dampen cyclical swings. However, the company remains vulnerable to sharp labor‑market deteriorations, which could compress demand for premium lease space.

Key Takeaways

Investors should monitor unemployment trends closely—an uptick of 1 pp can shave ~0.08 pp off JBGS revenue growth, the largest single‑factor impact.
The modest upside under a rate‑shock suggests that continued Fed tightening may not materially harm JBGS and could even provide a small tailwind via higher rent pricing power.
Given the limited overall sensitivity range, JBGS can be positioned as a defensive real‑estate play in volatile macro environments, but exposure to labor market softness remains the primary risk vector.

Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing

JBGS — Methodology & Reference

Scenario Definitions

Summary & Investment Implications

Key Takeaways

JBG SMITH Properties operates in a macro environment where rates are stable but inflation remains elevated at 3.68%. The firm’s moderate sensitivity and high stress resilience suggest it can weather adverse shocks, yet its negative exposure to both CPI and interest rates makes the current inflationary backdrop a headwind.

JBGS

JBGS exhibits a moderate macro sensitivity with a neutral fit to the prevailing stable‑rate, elevated‑inflation regime. Its high stress resilience (lowest impact –0.37 pp under 2008‑type stress) cushions downside, but the negative CPI exposure means rising inflation directly compresses rental growth and valuation multiples.

Investment Implications

Maintain a modest overweight to JBGS while monitoring CPI: a 1 ppt rise in CPI historically trims JBGS earnings by ~0.15 pp, so current CPI at 3.68% leaves limited upside unless inflation eases.
Position for a potential rate‑cut rally: the highest stress impact (+0.05 pp) occurs under a rapid rate shock (2022‑like), implying that a modest Fed easing could marginally boost JBGS performance, making short‑duration Treasury futures a hedge.

Trading Considerations

Watch weekly CPI releases; a reading below 3.5% for two consecutive months would signal easing pressure on JBGS rents and justify a tactical add.
Track Fed Funds moves: any surprise cut from the current 3.63% level could trigger a short‑term rally in REITs, presenting an entry window.

Risk Watchlist

CPI rising above 4.0%: would intensify cost pressures and likely reduce JBGS NOI by ~0.2 pp, prompting a reassessment of the neutral regime fit.
Unexpected rate hikes (Fed Funds >4.0%): could flip the stress impact to negative territory, eroding valuation multiples faster than historical trends.

Key Takeaways

JBGS is well‑buffered against severe macro stress but remains vulnerable to higher inflation.
Stable rates combined with any CPI moderation create the most favorable short‑term catalyst for JBGS.
A sustained CPI above 4% or a Fed rate hike beyond 4% would trigger a regime shift and merit portfolio rebalancing.

JBGS

Related Reports

Visit finexus.net/reports for more reports

Report written 2026-06-07 • Finexus

Disclaimer

This report is generated by Finexus and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.

The analysis is based on publicly available data from sources believed to be reliable, but Finexus does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. Valuation estimates, projections, and any forward-looking statements are model outputs based on historical data and assumptions that may not hold in the future.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision. Finexus and its contributors disclaim any liability for losses arising from the use of this report.

Higher Rates Meet Office Space — JBG Smith’s Quiet Advantage

Disclaimer

Higher Rates Meet Office Space — JBG Smith’s Quiet Advantage