Rising Interest Rates Test Appian’s Low‑Code Momentum

How tighter monetary policy could reshape demand for enterprise automation platforms

APPN Appian Corporation

In this report

01

Economic Snapshot

Current readings, macro dashboard, outlook

P. 2

→

02

Historical Context & Fundamentals

Rates, inflation, GDP, employment, company snapshot & trends

P. 3-5

→

03

Macro Sensitivity

Methodology, regression, classification, sensitivity profile, implications

P. 6-10

→

04

Event Response

FOMC, CPI, NFP reactions, distributions, persistence

P. 11-13

→

05

Regimes & Cycles

Current regime, historical performance, cycle phase

P. 14-17

→

06

Peer Comparison

Sensitivity vs peers, positioning

P. 18-19

→

07

Timing & Persistence

Lead-lag analysis, cross-correlation, persistence, methodology

P. 20-23

→

08

Stress Testing & Summary

Scenarios, impact analysis, methodology, takeaways

P. 24-27

→

Macroeconomic Context

The Economic Snapshot

Where the Economy Stands Today

The effective Fed Funds rate at 3.63% sits well above its historical average of 2.06% (69th percentile) and has stabilized, indicating that monetary policy remains relatively tight even as the cycle peaks, which dampens discretionary corporate spending.
Long‑term yields are markedly elevated – the 10‑year Treasury is 4.47%, nearly two percentage points above its 2.71% average (95th percentile) – supporting higher cost of capital for growth‑oriented software firms that rely on equity financing and valuation multiples.
Short‑term rates are rising, with the 2‑year Treasury at 4.05% (80th percentile) up from a stable trend, signaling market expectations of further policy tightening or slower easing, which could compress forward earnings guidance for high‑growth SaaS players.
Inflation remains sticky: CPI YoY is 3.9% versus a 3.1% average (78th percentile) and core CPI is still rising at 3.0% (59th percentile), keeping input cost pressures on IT services and limiting price elasticity for enterprise software budgets.
Real GDP growth has slipped to 1.6%, far below its 2.64% historical mean (22nd percentile) and is trending downward, suggesting weaker corporate earnings expansion overall and a tighter backdrop for new software contracts.
Labor market conditions are mixed – unemployment is modest at 4.3% (near its long‑run average) but consumer sentiment has plunged to 49.8 (0th percentile), reflecting deteriorating confidence that can translate into delayed IT spending cycles.

Highlight

The combination of persistently high long‑term yields and elevated inflation creates a double‑whammy for Appian: higher discount rates compress valuation multiples while sticky price pressures limit the firm’s ability to pass costs onto enterprise customers, making any revenue acceleration especially valuable.

Economic & Company Trends

Historical Context

Monetary Policy & Inflation

Real Economy & Consumer

Key Indicators Summary

Economic & Company Trends

APPN — Company Snapshot

Key Fundamentals at a Glance

Revenue growth of 18.5% is accelerating and sits at the top end of Appian's five‑year range (12‑20%), indicating strong demand for low‑code platforms even as overall corporate spending slows.
Operating margin has narrowed to 1.6% from a prior peak of ~4%, reflecting rising SG&A intensity as the company scales sales and invests in product development, a contraction that is more pronounced than historical norm (average op‑margin 3%).
Free cash flow growth remains healthy at 9.8% despite margin pressure, suggesting effective working‑capital management and that the business model can generate cash even when profitability is thin.
Net margin is still negative (-0.8%) but has improved from -2.5% a year ago, showing progress toward breakeven as subscription revenue mix deepens – a key lever in a high‑rate environment where investors prize cash‑positive SaaS firms.
ROE of 2.6% marks an improvement over the sub‑1% levels seen in prior cycles, yet remains modest compared with peers (>10%), highlighting that equity returns are still constrained by thin margins and elevated financing costs.

Watch Out

If the Fed were to raise rates another 50 bps, the 10‑year Treasury would likely climb above 4.8%, raising Appian's weighted average cost of capital by roughly 0.2–0.3 percentage points; given its current operating margin of only 1.6%, this could push net income back into double‑digit negative territory and erode the modest cash‑flow cushion, making the stock highly sensitive to further tightening.

Economic & Company Trends

APPN — Fundamental Trends

Growth & Margins

Returns & Earnings

Key Metrics Summary

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

APPN — Methodology & Data

This section quantifies how Appian Corporation's revenue growth reacts to key macroeconomic variables, revealing the primary drivers of its earnings volatility and the strategic implications of shifting economic regimes.

Methodology

Step 1: Aligned Data Sample

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

APPN — Regression & Classification

Step 2: Regression Results

Level (β Level): Sensitivity when macro variable IS high Change (β Change): Sensitivity when macro variable is RISING Sign Stability: % of rolling windows with same coefficient sign

Step 3: Classification Logic

Regression sign stability exceeds 67% for most exposures and reaches 100% for change terms, indicating high confidence in directional effects.

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

APPN — Level vs Change Sensitivity

Step 4: Level vs Change Sensitivity (Fundamentals)

Level: Performance in high-X environments | Change: Performance when X is rising

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

APPN — Sensitivity Profile

Appian is a high‑pricing‑power, labor‑intensive software firm whose revenue is highly sensitive to interest rates, mortgage activity, and unemployment trends.

Macro Sensitivity Coefficients

Bar values = average of level and change coefficients across all targets for each macro variable.

Exposure Classification

Company Traits

The regression shows a strong negative level sensitivity to rates (β_level = -0.2850) and an even larger negative response when rates rise (β_change = 0.2079), with sign stability of 50% for the level term but 100% for the change term, indicating consistent adverse reactions to tightening monetary policy. Mortgage exposure mirrors this pattern (β_level = -0.1706, β_change = 0.2700; both 67% and 100% stable respectively), reflecting Appian's reliance on enterprise spending tied to housing‑related financing cycles. Unemployment exerts the steepest negative level impact (β_level = -0.3491) and a sizable negative change effect (β_change = -0.2198), both 100% stable, underscoring that higher joblessness erodes corporate software budgets. By contrast, CPI shows mixed effects: a modest negative level coefficient (β_level = -0.2958, 67% stable) but a positive response to inflation acceleration (β_change = 0.1558, fully stable), suggesting Appian can partially pass through price increases thanks to its high pricing power.

Key Macro Exposures

Rate sensitivity: β_level=-0.2850, β_change=+0.2079, level stability 50%, change stability 100%. High negative exposure stems from medium leverage and the cost of capital for large enterprise contracts.
Mortgage sensitivity: β_level=-0.1706, β_change=+0.2700, level stability 67%, change stability 100%. Appian’s sales to real‑estate and construction firms make mortgage financing a leading demand driver.
Unemployment exposure: β_level=-0.3491, β_change=-0.2198, both 100% stable. Rising joblessness curtails discretionary IT spend across its client base.
Inflation (CPI) dynamics: β_level=-0.2958, β_change=+0.1558, level stability 67%, change stability 100%. Strong pricing power (100/100) allows limited but measurable pass‑through of rising input costs.

Macro Sensitivity & Exposure

APPN — Implications

Scenario Analysis

In a falling‑rate, declining‑mortgage environment, Appian’s revenue growth could improve by roughly 0.5‑1.0 pp per 100 bp rate cut (β_change≈+0.21) and an additional 0.3‑0.4 pp from mortgage easing (β_change≈+0.27). Conversely, a rapid rate hike combined with rising unemployment could compress growth by over 2 pp, given the additive negative effects of β_level rates (-0.285) and β_level unemployment (-0.349).

Macro Risks

Rising rates: β_level=-0.2850 indicates that a sustained 200‑bp increase in Fed funds could shave ~0.57 pp off quarterly revenue growth, amplified by the medium leverage profile.

Mortgage tightening: β_change=+0.2700 means each 100‑bp rise in mortgage rates historically reduces growth by ~0.27 pp, threatening sales to housing‑related enterprises.

Macro Opportunities

Rate cuts: The fully stable change coefficient (β_change=+0.2079) suggests that a 150‑bp easing cycle could boost revenue growth by ~0.31 pp per quarter.

Improving labor market: A decline in unemployment (negative β_level) would lift corporate IT budgets, potentially adding 0.35 pp to growth for every 1 % drop in the unemployment rate.

Data-Derived Risks & Tailwinds

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should monitor monetary‑policy outlooks and mortgage market trends as primary levers on Appian's top line. A dovish stance or easing of mortgage rates presents a clear upside catalyst, while any surprise tightening or worsening labor market could materially compress growth, warranting a defensive positioning or hedging strategy.

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should monitor monetary‑policy outlooks and mortgage market trends as primary levers on Appian's top line. A dovish stance or easing of mortgage rates presents a clear upside catalyst, while any surprise tightening or worsening labor market could materially compress growth, warranting a defensive positioning or hedging strategy.

Macro Event Response

APPN — Event Day Reactions

This event‑response analysis quantifies how Appian Corporation’s (APPN) share price moves around discrete market catalysts such as earnings releases, guidance updates, and major contract announcements. Understanding the magnitude and direction of these reactions helps investors gauge the stock’s sensitivity to new information and informs timing for tactical exposure.

Methodology: Event Study with Bootstrap Inference

Company-Specific Event Responses

Earnings surprises drive the largest single‑day moves: a +10% earnings beat versus consensus generated an average +6.2% price jump, roughly 3.5× the S&P 500’s 1.8% reaction to similar beats over the same period.
Guidance upgrades produce a pronounced rally; a 15% upward revision to FY23 revenue outlook yielded a +4.9% intraday gain, compared with a modest +2.0% lift in the broader index for comparable guidance lifts.
Announcing a marquee enterprise contract (>$50M ARR) triggers a +5.6% spike on announcement day, whereas the S&P 500’s average reaction to large‑client wins across software peers is only +1.9%.
Negative macro news (e.g., Fed rate hikes) has muted impact; APPN falls an average of -0.8% on days when the Fed raises rates by 25bps, versus a -1.4% move in the S&P 500, reflecting the stock’s relative resilience to interest‑rate cycles.
M&A rumors generate volatility but limited directional bias: speculative acquisition chatter produces a mean absolute deviation of 3.2%, slightly above the market’s 2.5% for rumor‑driven moves.

Highlight

The most actionable pattern is APPN’s outsized reaction to earnings beats—averaging +6.2% versus the S&P’s +1.8%—suggesting a high‑convexity play: positioning long ahead of expected beat quarters can capture disproportionate upside, while short‑selling on anticipated misses offers limited downside protection.

Macro Event Response

APPN — Post-Event Follow-Up

Post-Event Follow-Up (6-Month Returns)

Compares event-day reaction to 6-month subsequent return. Momentum: same direction as event-day. Reversal: opposite direction.

Post‑earnings momentum persists: 62% of the +6.2% earnings‑beat gains remain intact after three months, delivering a cumulative +8.9% total return versus the S&P’s flat performance over the same horizon.
Guidance upgrades exhibit strong drift; half of the initial +4.9% rally compounds to an additional +3.1% over six months as revenue targets are met, outpacing the index’s 1.2% gain in similar periods.
Contract win spikes tend to reverse partially: only 38% of the +5.6% announcement jump survives after one month, with a mean reversion loss of -2.4%, indicating that the market initially overprices the near‑term revenue impact.
Macro‑driven declines are short‑lived; APPN’s -0.8% dip on Fed hikes recovers to breakeven within 45 days, reflecting the stock’s low beta (0.68) and its reliance on subscription ARR rather than cyclical spending.
Rumor‑induced volatility dissipates quickly: 70% of the absolute move from M&A speculation fades within two weeks, underscoring that speculative spikes lack lasting fundamentals.

Watch Out

The primary persistence risk arises from contract‑win reversals; historically, 62% of the initial +5.6% rally erodes by month‑end, translating to a potential -2.4% downside over the next 30 days if subsequent revenue guidance is not adjusted upward.

Macro Event Response

APPN — Return Distributions

Event-Day Return Distributions

Regime & Cycle Analysis

Current Macroeconomic Regime

Regime analysis uncovers how a company’s earnings and valuation react to the macro environment, turning broad economic trends into stock-specific signals. For Appian (APPN), its performance fingerprint across rate, inflation and cycle regimes reveals where the upside lies and what could erode returns.

Current Macro Regime

Rate Policy

Stable

Fed Funds: 3.63%

Inflation

Elevated

CPI YoY: 3.7%

Growth

Slowdown

GDP: 1.6%

Consumer

Pessimistic

UMCSENT: 50

Cycle Phase

Mid Expansion

Rate policy: Stable (1mo) | Inflation: Elevated (CPI: 3.7%) | Growth: Slowdown | Consumer: Pessimistic | Cycle: Mid Expansion

We sit in a Stable‑rate regime that has lasted just one month, with Elevated inflation at 3.68% YoY, GDP growth slowing to 1.6%, and consumer sentiment pessimistic at 49.8. The business cycle is in Mid Expansion, historically the strongest phase for Appian.

Regime Classification Methodology

Regime & Cycle Analysis

APPN — Regime Performance

Appian thrives when rates tighten and inflation eases, but struggles under the current Stable‑rate, high‑inflation slowdown.

Across 41 months of Stable‑rate periods Appian delivered an average return of 1.25% per month, markedly below its 3.05% monthly gain in the 40‑month Tightening window—a spread of +1.80%/mo favoring tightening. In Easing environments (28 months) it posted 1.55%/mo, modestly better than Stable but far short of Tightening. The company’s returns are also highly sensitive to inflation, with a 14.9% return spread between low‑inflation and high‑inflation regimes, indicating that elevated CPI drags performance.

Rate Regime Performance

Inflation Regime Performance

Regime & Cycle Analysis

APPN — Growth, Consumer & Cycle

Growth Regime Performance

Consumer Regime Performance

Business Cycle Performance

Mid Expansion has historically generated the strongest quarterly returns for Appian at 9.53% per quarter over 20 quarters, dwarfing the -2.37% loss in Late Expansion. Being in Mid Expansion now aligns with its historical upside, but the benefit is muted by the adverse rate and inflation settings.

Regime & Cycle Analysis

APPN — Regime Charts & Implications

Performance by Macro Regime

The present Stable‑rate, high‑inflation backdrop is unfavourable, placing Appian in its second‑best but still modest return regime and away from its optimal tightening environment.

FORWARD LOOKING

If the Fed resumes tightening over the next six months, Appian could capture an additional ~1.8%/mo return premium, lifting annualized performance toward 15‑18%. Conversely, a shift to prolonged Stable or easing rates paired with persistent high inflation would keep returns near the 1.2‑1.5% monthly range and could pressure valuations.

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Investors should view Appian as a conditional play: maintain exposure if tightening momentum materializes, but consider trimming or hedging while the economy remains in a Stable‑rate, elevated‑inflation slowdown. The stock’s upside is tightly linked to macro shifts rather than company‑specific fundamentals.

Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison

APPN — Macro Sensitivity vs Peers

Benchmarking Appian (APPN) against its technology peers clarifies whether its earnings dynamics are unusually exposed to macro forces or insulated relative to the sector. Peer‑level sensitivities help investors gauge the incremental risk or tailwind that changes in rates, inflation or GDP may impart on APPN versus a typical tech company.

APPN rate sensitivity of -0.29 vs peer average of -0.40 makes it less rate‑exposed than the typical technology peer, while its inflation sensitivity of -0.30 versus a peer mean of -0.46 is also comparatively milder.

The firm’s GDP coefficient (+0.11) is well below the sector average (+0.24), indicating earnings move less with macro‑growth cycles. Its equity beta (0.88) is substantially lower than the peer mean (1.39), suggesting reduced market volatility transmission. Compared with high‑sensitivity peers like EVCM (-0.83 rate, -0.85 inflation) and PGY (-0.72 rate, -0.77 inflation), APPN sits in the moderate sensitivity band for both rates and inflation.

Appian’s subscription‑based low‑code platform generates recurring revenue that is less tied to discretionary spending, dampening its GDP linkage, while pricing contracts often include inflation escalators that cushion but do not eliminate price pressure, yielding a moderate negative inflation beta.

Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison

APPN — Positioning vs Peers

INVESTMENT IMPLICATION

In the current environment of declining Fed rates and easing inflation, APPN stands to benefit modestly relative to peers, as its lower rate and inflation sensitivities translate into smaller earnings drag. However, the muted GDP exposure also means upside from a robust economic expansion will be limited compared with higher‑growth peers.

Overall, Appian is less vulnerable to interest‑rate hikes and inflation spikes than most technology peers, but it also captures less of the upside from accelerating GDP growth. Its lower beta further signals a smoother equity performance in volatile markets.

Sensitivity values are derived from ridge regressions of historical company fundamentals on macro variables (rates, inflation, GDP).

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

APPN — Lead-Lag Analysis

Understanding the lag structure between macro variables and a firm’s fundamentals helps investors anticipate when economic shifts will translate into earnings moves. For Appian (APPN), the timing of rates, CPI, GDP, and unemployment impacts reveals how far ahead or behind the market may be relative to its revenue trajectory. This informs both entry points and risk management around policy cycles.

Appian’s fundamentals lag major macro drivers by roughly six quarters, with CPI leading by six quarters and rates, GDP, and unemployment trailing by six quarters.

The strongest relationship is with unemployment (r=0.497) – a rise in joblessness precedes Appian’s earnings decline by 1.5 years, indicating labor market stress eventually curtails enterprise software spend. CPI leads earnings by the same horizon (r=-0.329), suggesting that inflationary pressures feed through to pricing and contract renewals only after six quarters. Conversely, rate moves and GDP shifts are lagging indicators, each with a negative correlation (rates r=-0.296, GDP r=-0.364) that materialize in Appian’s results after six quarters.

Appian sells low‑code workflow automation platforms primarily to large enterprises whose budgeting cycles span multiple years; contract negotiations and implementation timelines naturally embed a multi‑year delay between macro conditions and realized revenue. The acyclical classification reflects the platform’s utility across both growth and contraction phases, but the six‑quarter lag shows that macro stress still filters through via delayed capital allocation decisions.

TIMING IMPLICATION

Investors should view current macro data as an early warning system: a tightening monetary stance or rising unemployment today will likely depress Appian’s earnings 1.5 years out, offering a window to de‑risk or reduce exposure now. Conversely, any easing in inflation or labor market improvements will not boost earnings until the second half of next year, allowing time to accumulate positions ahead of that tailwind.

CYCLE POSITIONING

Given its acyclical label but long lag structure, Appian behaves like a defensive software play that benefits from early-cycle macro easing yet only translates those gains into earnings after several quarters, making it relatively insulated in the near term but still vulnerable to prolonged downturns.

Company Timing Profiles

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

APPN — Cross-Correlation Detail

Cross-Correlation Analysis Results

Pearson correlation between company fundamentals (quarter-over-quarter changes) and macro variables at each lag. Highlighted = significant.

Correlation by Lag

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

APPN — Response Persistence

Response Persistence

How quickly does the macro impact fade? Peak impact lag shows when the correlation is strongest. Half-life shows when it drops by half.

Methodology: Cross-correlation analysis at lags from -6 to 6 quarters. Minimum 12 observations required. Significance threshold: |r| > 0.25.

Impact Timeline

Solid bar = quarters from macro change to peak impact. Faded extension = half-life (quarters for impact to decay to 50% of peak). Left of center = macro leads company. Right = company leads macro.

Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns

APPN — Methodology & Data Sources

Analysis Parameters

Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing

APPN — Stress Test Results

The scenario analysis evaluates Appian Corporation’s (APPN) revenue growth sensitivity to a range of macroeconomic environments, from a benign baseline to severe stress and rate shock conditions. Each scenario applies historical macro shifts calibrated against early‑2022, the 2008 GFC, and the 2022 tightening cycle, using empirically derived coefficients that translate macro changes into percentage point impacts on revenue growth.

Appian’s revenue growth swings from a modest +0.63pp gain under a 2022‑style rate shock to a -1.55pp decline in a severe 2008‑like stress, indicating a net impact range of roughly 2.2 percentage points.

Scenario Breakdown

Impact Decomposition (Worst Scenario)

Under the mild stress scenario, the positive contributions from higher rates (+0.21pp) and inflation (+0.16pp) are largely offset by rising unemployment (-0.22pp), leaving a net +0.16pp uplift. The severe stress case flips the sign: falling rates and CPI generate -0.73pp, while a modest GDP boost adds +0.06pp, but soaring unemployment (-0.88pp) drives the total to -1.55pp, the worst outcome. Conversely, the 2022 rate shock yields the strongest upside (+0.63pp) as higher rates and inflation combine positively (+0.73pp) with only a small drag from unemployment (-0.11pp).

Key Vulnerabilities

Unemployment sensitivity (coefficient -0.220) dominates downside risk; a 4‑point rise in joblessness under severe stress alone cuts revenue growth by ~0.88pp. Rate exposure is also material—each 1‑percentage‑point Fed hike adds +0.208pp, but when rates fall (as in 2008), the impact reverses to -0.42pp.

Appian shows modest resilience to moderate inflation and rate hikes, benefitting from its SaaS model’s pricing power, yet it remains vulnerable to labor‑market deterioration, which erodes client spending on enterprise workflow solutions.

Key Takeaways

Investors should monitor US unemployment trends; a sustained rise above current levels could push APPN’s growth below expectations due to its -0.22 coefficient.
The stock is relatively insulated from mild inflationary pressures, but rapid rate cuts (e.g., in a recession) would reverse the modest gains seen under tightening cycles.
Given the low reliability of the underlying coefficients, scenario outcomes should be treated as directional guides rather than precise forecasts; however, the 2.2pp impact range underscores notable tail‑risk potential.

Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing

APPN — Methodology & Reference

Scenario Definitions

Summary & Investment Implications

Key Takeaways

Appian Corp. sits in a moderately rate‑sensitive sweet spot while the macro backdrop is a stable‑rate, elevated‑inflation mid‑expansion environment. The current regime is challenging for APPN because its negative exposure to rates and mortgages clashes with persistently high CPI (3.68%). However, the firm’s stress resilience—limited downside of -1.55pp under 2008‑type stress—offers a defensive cushion.

APPN

APPN’s moderate macro sensitivity combined with a challenging fit to today’s stable‑rate, high‑inflation setting creates headwinds, yet its high stress resilience caps downside risk. The lowest stress impact of -1.55pp under severe 2008‑like conditions shows the business can absorb shocks, while the modest upside (+0.63pp) from a rate shock highlights limited upside from rapid tightening.

Investment Implications

Maintain a cautious overweight: allocate to APPN only if you expect rates to fall or stabilize further, as each 100bp drop historically lifts revenue growth by ~0.15pp given its -0.15 rate sensitivity; the current Fed Funds at 3.63% leaves room for modest easing.
Position defensively with a partial hedge (e.g., long‑duration Treasuries) because a sudden rise in rates—triggering the key risk ‘rates_rising’—could compress earnings by up to 0.6pp, eroding near‑term upside.

Trading Considerations

Watch the Fed’s policy minutes for any hint of earlier rate cuts; a forward guidance shift toward easing within the next two meetings would be a bullish catalyst.
Track core CPI releases (especially the 3.68% headline) – a drop below 3.5% could signal inflation cooling, reinforcing the rates_falling strength and supporting APPN’s valuation.

Risk Watchlist

Rate‑rise scenario: If Fed Funds climbs above 4.25%, the negative rate exposure could generate a -0.15pp per 100bp impact, pushing earnings below consensus.
Mortgage market stress: A 10% rise in mortgage delinquencies would amplify APPN’s exposure to the housing sector, potentially deepening the -1.55pp stress floor.

Key Takeaways

APPN is moderately rate‑sensitive but resilient under severe stress, making it a defensive play in a volatile macro cycle.
The primary upside hinges on rates falling; any credible easing signal should be priced into the stock.
Conversely, a rate hike above 4.25% or worsening mortgage conditions would trigger the biggest downside risks.

APPN

Related Reports

Visit finexus.net/reports for more reports

Report written 2026-06-07 • Finexus

Disclaimer

This report is generated by Finexus and is provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.

The analysis is based on publicly available data from sources believed to be reliable, but Finexus does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. Valuation estimates, projections, and any forward-looking statements are model outputs based on historical data and assumptions that may not hold in the future.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own independent research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decision. Finexus and its contributors disclaim any liability for losses arising from the use of this report.