Overview: Economic & Company Trends
Short‑term rates are climbing while longer‑term yields stay flat, and inflation is easing—a mixed backdrop that keeps the economy in a transitional phase.
The 2‑year Treasury is on an upward path, signaling tighter monetary conditions ahead, whereas the 10‑year Treasury remains stable, keeping long‑term financing costs unchanged. Consumer price inflation is slipping, but core CPI is holding steady, suggesting price pressures are moderating without a broad deflationary trend. Real GDP growth is trending lower, yet the unemployment rate is flat and consumer sentiment is rising, hinting at a resilience in demand despite slower output.
- 2‑Year Treasury rising – indicates short‑term borrowing costs are increasing, which can raise financing expenses for corporate borrowers.
- 30‑Year Mortgage Rate climbing – pushes up the cost of home financing, potentially dampening property‑related activity that underpins CBRE's client base.
- CPI (All Items) falling – reflects easing inflation, which may improve discretionary spending and support the commercial real‑estate market.
CBRE posted robust revenue growth of 30.5% but operates on thin margins (3.6%) and modest ROE (4.7%). The rise in short‑term rates and mortgage costs could constrain transaction volumes, yet stable employment and improving consumer sentiment provide a countervailing tailwind for its leasing and advisory services.
Overall Trajectory: Overall, the environment is in flux: tightening financing meets easing inflation and steady labor markets.
The charts below trace the evolution of these macro trends alongside CBRE's financial performance.
Economic Environment
| Indicator | Current | Historical Avg | Percentile | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective Fed Funds Rate | 3.64% | 2.04% | 70th | → Stable |
| 10-Year Treasury | 4.30% | 2.67% | 92th | → Stable |
| 2-Year Treasury | 3.79% | 2.19% | 76th | ↑ Rising |
| 30-Year Mortgage Rate | 6.38% | 4.73% | 76th | ↑ Rising |
| CPI (All Items) YoY | 2.6% | 3.1% | 53th | ↓ Falling |
| Core CPI YoY | 2.7% | 3.1% | 52th | → Stable |
| Real GDP Growth | 0.70% | 2.66% | 14th | ↓ Falling |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.40% | 4.64% | 59th | → Stable |
| Consumer Sentiment | 56.6 | 80.5 | 7th | ↑ Rising |
Company Fundamentals
Stock Performance
Data period: 2015-01 to 2026-03
Macro Sensitivity & Exposure Analysis
Understanding how CBRE's revenue growth reacts to macroeconomic shifts is crucial for investors who allocate to commercial real‑estate services. This section reveals the firm’s sensitivities to inflation, interest rates, mortgage rates, consumer sentiment and labor market conditions over the 2016‑2025 period.
We regressed quarterly revenue growth against six macro indicators using ridge regression with a 16‑quarter rolling window, tracking sign stability to gauge confidence.
CBRE
CBRE is a moderately cyclical, inflation‑sensitive real‑estate services firm with pronounced rate and CPI exposure.
The regression shows a high‑negative sensitivity to CPI levels (β=-0.3603, 57% stable) and to Fed‑funds rates (β=-0.3118, 71% stable), indicating revenue growth erodes in high‑inflation or high‑rate environments. Mortgage‑rate levels also depress growth (β=-0.2407, 57% stable) but the change coefficient is small (β=-0.0122, 86% stable). Consumer sentiment drives growth positively at the level (β=+0.3175, 57% stable) yet deteriorates when sentiment improves (β=-0.1079, 86% stable), reflecting a lagged response to sentiment swings. Unemployment levels modestly hurt (β=-0.2630, 57% stable) and rising unemployment further pressures growth (β=-0.1256, 100% stable). GDP growth has negligible impact (β=-0.0123, 57% stable).
- Inflation (CPI) level: β=-0.3603 (high negative), 57% sign stability – revenue falls as inflation rises.
- Rate (Fed Funds) level: β=-0.3118 (high negative), 71% sign stability – higher policy rates compress earnings.
- Mortgage rate level: β=-0.2407 (moderate negative), 57% sign stability – higher mortgage costs dampen client activity.
- Consumer sentiment level: β=+0.3175 (high positive), 57% sign stability – strong sentiment lifts demand for space.
- Unemployment level: β=-0.2630 (moderate negative), 57% sign stability – weaker labor markets reduce leasing activity.
If inflation and rates continue to rise, CBRE is likely to see margin compression and slower revenue growth; conversely, a decline in CPI and a easing of rates should provide a clear tailwind, improving top‑line momentum. A surge in consumer confidence would boost demand for office and retail space, while a deteriorating labor market would weigh on leasing activity.
- CPI rising (β=-0.3603, 57% stable) – high inflation erodes client spending and limits pass‑through pricing given modest gross margin (24.9%).
- Fed‑funds rates rising (β=-0.3118, 71% stable) – higher borrowing costs increase CBRE's own financing expense (D/E=0.37) and suppress client investment.
- Mortgage rates rising (β=-0.2407, 57% stable) – elevated borrowing costs for tenants reduce occupancy demand.
- Consumer sentiment falling (β=-0.1079 change, 86% stable) – weaker confidence curtails demand for new space.
- CPI falling (β=+0.0397 change, 86% stable) – lower inflation improves client cash flow and may allow CBRE to win discretionary projects.
- Rates falling (implied positive shift from level) – reduced financing costs for both CBRE and its tenants can stimulate leasing activity.
- Mortgage rates falling (no significant change coefficient) – lower tenant financing costs could revive demand for commercial space.
- Consumer sentiment rising (β=+0.3175 level, 57% stable) – stronger confidence drives higher demand for office, retail and industrial footprints.
CBRE exhibits a clear macro‑sensitive profile, with high‑negative exposure to inflation and policy rates and a strong positive link to consumer sentiment, distinguishing it from more defensive sectors that show muted macro coefficients.
Sign stability exceeds 75% for only a few change‑coefficients (e.g., unemployment change 100%); many level coefficients hover around 57‑71%, indicating moderate confidence in the estimated sensitivities.
Investors should monitor CPI and Fed‑funds rate trajectories as primary drivers of CBRE's near‑term performance. In environments of declining inflation and easing rates, the firm stands to benefit from improved client activity, while persistent price pressures or higher rates pose a material headwind. Positioning the stock with an eye on these macro trends, or using inflation‑linked hedges, can help manage exposure.
Methodology
Revenue_Growth_t = α + β₁(Macro_Level_t) + β₂(Macro_Change_t) + ε
Model specification: - Y = Company revenue growth (quarterly) - Macro_Level = Absolute value of macro variable (e.g., Fed Funds at 5%) - Macro_Change = Quarter-over-quarter change in macro variable - Separate regressions for each macro variable to isolate effects - Ridge regularization (α=1.0) to handle multicollinearity Sign stability is computed by running the regression on rolling 20-quarter windows and counting the fraction of windows with the same coefficient sign.
- High: |β| > 0.3
- Moderate: |β| > 0.1
- Low: |β| ≤ 0.1
- Stable: Sign stability > 75%
- Moderate: Sign stability > 50%
- Unstable: Sign stability ≤ 50%
CBRE - CBRE Group, Inc.
Sample of the data used for regression analysis. Company fundamentals aligned with macro indicators by quarter.
| Fiscal Quarter | Revenue Growth (YoY %) | Gross Margin (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 2016Q1 | 38.7% | 29.3% |
| 2016Q2 | 34.2% | 30.3% |
| 2016Q3 | 17.7% | 29.9% |
| ... | ... | ... |
| 2025Q2 | 16.2% | 93.7% |
| 2025Q3 | 13.5% | 19.4% |
| 2025Q4 | 11.8% | 18.5% |
Ridge regression coefficients (β) showing sensitivity to each macro variable. Separate columns for Level (absolute value) and Change (direction).
| Variable | β (Level) | β (Change) | Sign Stability (L) | Sign Stability (C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPI | -0.360 | 0.040 | 57% | 86% |
| RATES | -0.312 | -0.039 | 71% | 57% |
| MORTGAGE | -0.241 | -0.012 | 57% | 86% |
| CONSUMER | 0.317 | -0.108 | 57% | 86% |
| GDP | -0.012 | -0.029 | 57% | 86% |
| UNEMPLOYMENT | -0.263 | -0.126 | 57% | 100% |
* p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01 | Sign Stability = fraction of rolling windows with same coefficient sign
How we applied thresholds to convert regression coefficients into classifications.
| Variable | Type | β | → Direction | → Strength | → Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPI | Level | -0.360 | Negative | High | Moderate |
| CPI | Change | 0.040 | Neutral | Low | Stable |
| RATES | Level | -0.312 | Negative | High | Moderate |
| RATES | Change | -0.039 | Neutral | Low | Moderate |
| MORTGAGE | Level | -0.241 | Negative | Moderate | Moderate |
| MORTGAGE | Change | -0.012 | Neutral | Low | Stable |
| CONSUMER | Level | 0.317 | Positive | High | Moderate |
| CONSUMER | Change | -0.108 | Negative | Low | Stable |
| GDP | Level | -0.012 | Neutral | Low | Moderate |
| GDP | Change | -0.029 | Neutral | Low | Stable |
| UNEMPLOYMENT | Level | -0.263 | Negative | High | Moderate |
| UNEMPLOYMENT | Change | -0.126 | Negative | Moderate | Stable |
Company characteristics that inform macro sensitivity expectations:
| Trait | Classification | Key Metric | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Power | Low | GM: 24.9% | Margin compression risk |
| Leverage | Medium | D/E: 0.37 | Moderate rate exposure |
| Macro Variable | Direction | Strength | Confidence | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPI | ↓ Negative | High | Moderate | High negative cpi exposure |
| RATES | ↓ Negative | High | Moderate | High negative rates exposure |
| MORTGAGE | ↓ Negative | High | Moderate | High negative mortgage exposure |
| CONSUMER | ↑ Positive | High | Moderate | High positive consumer exposure |
| GDP | — Neutral | Low | Moderate | Low neutral gdp exposure |
| UNEMPLOYMENT | ↔ Mixed | High | Moderate | High mixed unemployment exposure |
Level: Performance in high-X environments | Change: Performance when X is rising
| Variable | Level Sensitivity | Change Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|
| CPI |
Negative (high)
Performs worse in high-inflation environments (high)
|
Neutral
No significant sensitivity to inflation changes
|
| RATES |
Negative (high)
Performs worse in high-interest rate environments (high)
|
Neutral
No significant sensitivity to interest rates changes
|
| GDP |
Neutral
No significant sensitivity to GDP levels
|
Neutral
No significant sensitivity to GDP changes
|
| UNEMPLOYMENT |
Negative (high)
Performs worse in high-unemployment environments (high)
|
Negative (moderate)
Hurt when unemployment rises (moderate)
|
- Cpi rising
- Rates rising
- Mortgage rising
- Consumer falling
- Cpi falling
- Rates falling
- Mortgage falling
- Consumer rising
Summary: CBRE is negatively exposed to inflation and negatively exposed to interest rates. Key risks: cpi increases, rates increases.
Method: Mixed | Data: 44 quarters (2015Q1-2025Q4)
Macro Shock / Event Response
Methodology: Event Study with Bootstrap Inference
We analyze stock returns around macroeconomic announcements using bootstrap confidence intervals for the median. This approach is robust to outliers and makes no distributional assumptions.
Median is robust to extreme outliers. A single +10% or -10% day won't distort the central tendency.
Resample data 1000x, compute median each time, take percentiles. No normality assumption required.
If CI excludes zero → evidence of consistent directional pattern.
If CI includes zero → no reliable pattern detected.
When macro data drops, investors scramble to price its impact—but the reaction isn’t uniform across every stock. For a real‑estate services giant like CBRE, the market’s response to Fed moves, inflation prints, and jobs reports can reveal how sensitive its valuation is to broader economic tides. This event‑study snapshot walks through those historic patterns.
We examined daily returns surrounding 440 macro and earnings events from Jan 2015 to Jun 2026, using bootstrap‑derived 95% confidence intervals on median returns to flag statistically reliable moves.
GDP releases generate the clearest directional response, while most other macro events show muted, statistically ambiguous reactions.
Key Findings Across All Companies:Across the sample, the median market move on FOMC, CPI and NFP days hovers near zero and the confidence bands all contain zero, indicating no consistent pattern. By contrast, GDP announcements produce a statistically significant median uplift of +0.41% (95% CI +0.20% to +0.68%) and a positive‑event share of 62.2%. Overall, just over half of the events yield a positive return, underscoring mixed investor sentiment.
- FOMC: Median +0.07% (95% CI ‑0.32% to +0.47%) with 53.3% of days positive – the interval spans zero, so the reaction is not statistically reliable.
- CPI: Median +0.19% (95% CI ‑0.81% to +0.40%) and 54.3% positive – again, the confidence band includes zero, suggesting no firm directional bias.
- NFP: Median +0.23% (95% CI ‑0.29% to +0.47%) with 51.7% positive – the spread is wide, reflecting high noise around employment news.
- GDP: Median +0.41% (95% CI +0.20% to +0.68%) and 62.2% positive – the only macro event where the CI excludes zero, indicating a repeatable positive lift.
CBRE
CBRE’s stock nudges higher on macro news, but only GDP releases spark a statistically reliable lift.
Across 92 FOMC, 70 CPI, 143 NFP and 135 GDP events, CBRE’s median daily return is modestly positive—ranging from +0.07% on Fed meetings to +0.41% on GDP releases. The confidence intervals for FOMC, CPI, and NFP all contain zero, indicating that the market’s reaction is not systematic. GDP stands out with a significant median gain (+0.41%, 95% CI +0.20% to +0.68%) and 62.2% of those days ending positive, reflecting the firm’s exposure to overall economic growth. Earnings announcements generate the highest median jump (+0.54%) but the interval (‑0.45% to +2.03%) is too wide to claim statistical certainty.
Six‑month cumulative returns after macro events hover around 7‑8%, with momentum rates just above 50% (e.g., 54.4% for GDP). Earnings releases show the strongest persistence, with 64.3% of events maintaining the same sign over six months.
- Even though median reactions are small, more than half of all macro events end positive (53‑62% across types), suggesting a slight bias toward upside in a generally growth‑oriented sector.
- The 6‑month return tail after GDP news (+7.06% median) exceeds that after CPI (+7.52%) and NFP (+8.03%), implying that the initial positive lift often compounds as the broader economy validates the growth signal.
- Earnings‑driven moves, while not statistically significant on the day, generate the largest six‑month median gain (+11.89%) and the highest momentum rate (64.3%), hinting that fundamental beat‑or‑miss outcomes drive longer‑term price drift.
The histograms below display the full distribution of event‑day returns, highlighting the spread of outcomes beyond the median figures.
These patterns reflect historical tendencies and are subject to sample‑size constraints—especially for earnings events (n=44). Market dynamics, regulatory shifts, or structural changes in the real‑estate sector could alter future sensitivities.
For investors, CBRE’s modest but positive tilt on macro news suggests that rate or inflation surprises alone are unlikely to swing the stock dramatically. However, GDP announcements—signaling broader economic health—have historically nudged the share upward and the effect can linger for months. Monitoring the macro backdrop can help time entry or add‑on positions, but sizing should respect the modest magnitude and the inherent noise in daily reactions.
Aggregate Event Responses (All Companies)
Note on Aggregation: The aggregate statistics pool all individual stock returns on event days without weighting. Each stock-event observation is treated equally. For portfolio-level inference, consider applying appropriate weights based on your holdings. S&P 500 benchmark is included for market-wide comparison.
Median daily return on event days, with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. S&P 500 shown as market benchmark.
| Event Type | N Events | Portfolio Median | S&P 500 Median | 95% CI (Portfolio) | % Positive | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOMC | 92 | +0.07% | -0.02% | [-0.32%, +0.47%] | 53% | CI includes zero |
| CPI | 70 | +0.19% | +0.25% | [-0.81%, +0.40%] | 54% | CI includes zero |
| NFP | 143 | +0.23% | +0.18% | [-0.29%, +0.47%] | 52% | CI includes zero |
| GDP | 135 | +0.41% | +0.15% | [+0.20%, +0.68%] | 62% | CI excludes zero |
N=92 events
N=70 events
N=143 events
N=135 events
Company-Specific Event Responses
CBRE - CBRE Group, Inc.
Data: 2015-01-05 to 2026-04-01 (2827 trading days) | Most reactive to: Earnings
| Event | N | Median | 95% CI | % Positive | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOMC | 92 | +0.07% | [-0.32%, +0.47%] | 53% | No clear pattern |
| CPI | 70 | +0.19% | [-0.81%, +0.40%] | 54% | No clear pattern |
| NFP | 143 | +0.23% | [-0.29%, +0.47%] | 52% | No clear pattern |
| GDP | 135 | +0.41% | [+0.20%, +0.68%] | 62% | Positive pattern |
| Earnings | 44 | +0.54% | [-0.45%, +2.03%] | 55% | No clear pattern |
Compares event-day reaction to 6-month subsequent return. Momentum: same direction as event-day. Reversal: opposite direction.
| Event | Events w/ 6M Data | Avg 6M Return | Momentum | Reversal | Dominant Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOMC | 87 | +7.1% | 39 (45%) | 48 (55%) | Mixed |
| CPI | 57 | +7.5% | 30 (53%) | 26 (46%) | Mixed |
| NFP | 130 | +8.0% | 67 (52%) | 63 (48%) | Mixed |
| GDP | 125 | +7.1% | 68 (54%) | 57 (46%) | Mixed |
| Earnings | 42 | +11.9% | 27 (64%) | 15 (36%) | Momentum |
N=92
N=70
N=143
N=135
N=44
FOMC: Median: +0.07% (95% CI: -0.32% to +0.47%), N=92; Earnings: Median: +0.54% (95% CI: -0.45% to +2.03%), N=44
Regime, Cycle & State-Dependent Behavior
Current Macro Regime
Rate policy: Easing (5mo) | Inflation: Moderate (CPI: 2.5%) | Growth: Slowdown | Consumer: Cautious | Cycle: Early Expansion
Regime analysis reveals how a company’s stock reacts to the shifting macro backdrop. Some firms thrive when rates are steady, while others stumble in easing environments. Mapping CBRE’s performance across these regimes helps gauge its resilience and upside potential.
As of March 1 2026 we are in an Easing rate regime (Fed Funds 3.64%, down 0.58% over six months), with Moderate inflation (CPI 2.45% YoY), a Slowdown in growth (GDP 0.7%), and Cautious consumer sentiment (56.6). The business cycle sits in Early Expansion, signalling the early stages of a post‑recession recovery.
CBRE
CBRE is a stable‑rate play—it shines when policy is predictable and falters when the Fed eases.
In Stable‑rate periods CBRE posted an average monthly return of +2.65% (median +2.72%) with 63.8% positive months, but volatility was relatively high at 9.64%. During Tightening cycles the stock still delivered a positive +0.92% average return (median +1.47%) and 52.3% positive months, albeit with lower volatility (8.00%). In contrast, Easing environments produced a negative average return of -0.41% per month (median still slightly positive at +1.02%) and a 9.12% volatility, with only 51.9% of months ending up. The 3.06% spread between the best (Stable) and worst (Easing) regimes underscores a clear rate sensitivity.
Best: Stable rates combined with moderate inflation and an expanding economy. Worst: Easing rates paired with high inflation and a contracting cycle.
The present Easing‑rate, Moderate‑inflation backdrop is neutral to slightly adverse for CBRE, given its -0.41% average return in similar past periods.
CBRE’s performance varies markedly across rate regimes, confirming strong state‑dependent behavior.
We are in the Early Expansion phase, where historically CBRE’s returns have been modest but positive. The firm’s strongest historical performance has come in Mid Expansion, suggesting that a move up the cycle could boost its earnings and stock momentum.
With a 3.06% performance spread, CBRE shows notable macro sensitivity—more cyclical than highly defensive real‑estate peers that tend to exhibit smaller spreads. Its volatility rises in both Stable and Easing regimes, indicating that while it can generate outsized gains when rates are steady, it also bears higher risk when policy shifts.
If the Fed continues easing, CBRE may face pressure, potentially extending its recent -0.41% monthly average. Conversely, a pivot to Stable or Tightening rates, coupled with sustained moderate inflation, would likely re‑ignite its +2.65%/mo upside. A resurgence in GDP growth that pushes the cycle toward Mid Expansion would further align with its historically strongest environment.
Investors should treat CBRE as a macro‑sensitive holding: allocate it when expecting stable or tightening rate conditions and moderate inflation, but be prepared for downside in prolonged easing periods. Position sizing and diversification can mitigate the heightened volatility observed in its best and worst regimes.
Regime Classification Methodology
We classify macro regimes using transparent, rules-based thresholds applied to historical data.
- Tightening: >+25% 6mo change
- Easing: <-25% 6mo change
- High: >4% CPI YoY
- Elevated: 2-4% CPI YoY
- Moderate: 2-3% CPI YoY
- Low: <2% CPI YoY
- Expansion: >2% GDP
- Slowdown: 0-2% GDP
- Contraction: <0% GDP
- Confident: >85 UMCSENT
- Neutral: 70-85 UMCSENT
- Cautious: 55-70 UMCSENT
- Pessimistic: <55 UMCSENT
Performance by Macro Regime
Current regime: Moderate
Current regime: Slowdown
Current phase: Early Expansion
Company Regime Profiles
CBRE - CBRE Group, Inc.
| Regime | Months | Avg Return | Volatility | % Positive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stable ⬆ | 58 | +2.65%/mo | 9.64% | 64% |
| Tightening | 44 | +0.92%/mo | 8.00% | 52% |
| Easing ⬇ | 27 | -0.41%/mo | 9.12% | 52% |
Performance spread (best - worst): 3.06%/mo
| Phase | Quarters | Avg Quarterly Return |
|---|---|---|
| Early Expansion NOW | 6 | +1.8%/qtr |
| Mid Expansion ⬆ | 29 | +7.0%/qtr |
| Late Expansion | 5 | +3.0%/qtr |
| Contraction ⬇ | 4 | -9.6%/qtr |
- Rate sensitivity: Performs best in Stable (+2.65%/mo), worst in Easing (-0.41%/mo)
- Inflation impact: Favors moderate environments
- Cycle positioning: Historically strongest in Mid Expansion
Analysis period: 2015-01 to 2026-03 | Quarters analyzed: 45
Cross-Sectional & Peer Comparison
Peer comparison places a company’s macro sensitivities in context, revealing whether its fundamentals move in step with, or diverge from, industry norms. By benchmarking against a peer set, investors can gauge relative exposure to interest rates, inflation, and economic growth, and assess the implications of leverage and market beta.
CBRE
CBRE rate sensitivity of -0.31 exceeds the peer average of -0.20, inflation sensitivity of -0.36 is markedly lower than the peer average of -0.13, while its GDP sensitivity of -0.01 is slightly below the peer average of +0.05; its equity beta of 1.34 tops the peer mean of 0.87 and its leverage ratio of 0.37 is well under the peer average of 1.34.
CBRE’s rate coefficient of -0.31 places it in the high‑sensitivity bracket, yet it is 55% more rate‑exposed than the typical peer. Its inflation coefficient of -0.36 signals a strong negative reaction to price pressures, more than double the average peer response. Conversely, CBRE’s GDP coefficient is near neutral, indicating limited cyclicality relative to peers that show modest positive GDP links.
The heightened rate and inflation sensitivities stem from CBRE’s large portfolio of leased office and industrial space, where lease terms often reset with market rates and rent escalations are tied to CPI. A lower leverage ratio (0.37 vs 1.34 peer average) dampens the amplification of macro shocks on earnings, but also limits the firm’s ability to boost returns through debt‑financed acquisitions.
In a rising‑rate, inflation‑persistent environment, CBRE is likely to see earnings pressure greater than most peers, though its modest leverage provides a cushion. Investors seeking exposure to real‑estate fundamentals with lower debt risk should note the trade‑off of heightened macro sensitivity.
Across the peer set, most REITs exhibit moderate to high negative rate and inflation sensitivities, but CBRE stands out for being more rate‑exposed and markedly more inflation‑sensitive while maintaining a low leverage profile. Its beta of 1.34 suggests greater equity‑market volatility than peers, positioning CBRE as a higher‑risk, higher‑reward play within the sector.
CBRE vs Peers
Real Estate | 8 peers analyzed
| Company | Rate Sens. | Inflation Sens. | GDP Sens. | Beta | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | -0.31 | -0.36 | -0.01 | 1.34 | 0.37 |
| PSA | -0.22 | +0.14 | +0.01 | 0.96 | 1.11 |
| CCI | -0.53 | -0.62 | +0.02 | 0.95 | N/A |
| BEKE | -0.13 | -0.31 | +0.08 | -0.59 | 0.28 |
| O | +0.06 | +0.36 | -0.07 | 0.77 | 0.83 |
| CSGP | -0.36 | -0.40 | +0.10 | 0.90 | 0.12 |
| JLL | -0.35 | -0.06 | +0.12 | 1.44 | 0.45 |
| DLR | -0.34 | -0.42 | +0.11 | 1.13 | 0.86 |
| SPG | +0.29 | +0.30 | +0.02 | 1.40 | 5.75 |
| Peer Average | -0.20 | -0.13 | +0.05 | 0.87 | 1.34 |
Sensitivity values are regression coefficients. Negative rate sensitivity = hurt by rising rates. Positive inflation sensitivity = benefits from inflation.
Positioning vs Peers
CBRE
Peers analyzed: 8 | Peers with sufficient data: 8
Macro & Fundamental Time Patterns
Data Summary
- Found 4 significant macro-fundamental relationships (|r| >= 0.25).
Understanding how quickly a company’s fundamentals react to macroeconomic shifts helps investors time entry and exit decisions. Lag analysis reveals whether earnings will feel a policy change today, next quarter, or further down the road, shaping short‑term risk and positioning strategies.
CBRE
CBRE’s fundamentals lag interest rates by 2 quarters, CPI by 5 quarters, GDP by 6 quarters, and move contemporaneously with unemployment.
The fastest macro driver is the federal funds rate, with a 2‑quarter lag and a modest negative correlation (‑0.31), indicating earnings dip as rates rise but only after half a year. Inflation (CPI) and overall economic growth (GDP) take longer to filter through, showing 5‑quarter (‑0.46) and 6‑quarter (‑0.53) lags respectively. Unemployment is the only variable that aligns in real time (0‑quarter lag, correlation ‑0.51).
CBRE operates in commercial real‑estate leasing and property management, where lease negotiations, construction timelines, and tenant decisions span multiple quarters, creating delayed sensitivity to broader economic conditions. Labor market changes affect occupancy and rent‑growth more immediately, explaining the contemporaneous link to unemployment.
Investors should expect CBRE’s earnings to reflect macro shifts with a built‑in delay, allowing a window to position ahead of the impact. Rising rates or inflation may not depress results for 2‑6 quarters, offering a short‑term buffer but also signaling that a turnaround in macro conditions will take time to translate into higher earnings.
With a 2‑quarter rate lag and up to a 6‑quarter GDP lag, CBRE sits on the slower end of the response spectrum, typical of late‑cycle, defensive businesses. Compared to peers that often react within 0‑2 quarters, CBRE provides investors more lead time before macro effects materialize.
CBRE is classified as a late‑cycle company, reflecting its slower reaction to macroeconomic changes and defensive positioning in the business cycle.
Company Timing Profiles
| Company | Rate Lag | CPI Lag | GDP Lag | Unemp Lag | Cycle Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 2Q | 5Q | 6Q | 0Q | Late-cycle |
Lag = quarters after macro change before company fundamentals respond. Green = fast response (≤1Q). Red = slow response (≥4Q).
Cross-Correlation Analysis Results
Pearson correlation between company fundamentals (quarter-over-quarter changes) and macro variables at each lag. Highlighted cells indicate |r| ≥ 0.25 (significant).
CBRE
revenue_growth
Show correlation at all 13 lags
| Lag (Q) | -6 | -5 | -4 | -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | -0.04 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.14 | -0.03 | -0.21 | -0.29 | -0.31 | -0.23 | -0.17 | -0.13 | -0.07 |
Yellow = optimal lag. Green/Red = significant positive/negative correlation.
CBRE shows moderate negative correlation and responds 2 quarters after interest rate changes.
revenue_growth
Show correlation at all 13 lags
| Lag (Q) | -6 | -5 | -4 | -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | -0.45 | -0.34 | -0.22 | -0.08 | 0.02 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.10 | -0.21 | -0.32 | -0.45 | -0.46 | -0.42 |
Yellow = optimal lag. Green/Red = significant positive/negative correlation.
CBRE shows strong negative correlation and responds 5 quarters after inflation changes.
revenue_growth
Show correlation at all 13 lags
| Lag (Q) | -6 | -5 | -4 | -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | -0.25 | -0.19 | -0.25 | -0.16 | -0.07 | -0.02 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.04 | -0.13 | -0.37 | -0.46 | -0.53 |
Yellow = optimal lag. Green/Red = significant positive/negative correlation.
CBRE shows strong negative correlation and responds 6 quarters after GDP growth changes.
revenue_growth
Show correlation at all 13 lags
| Lag (Q) | -6 | -5 | -4 | -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | -0.03 | -0.05 | -0.04 | -0.10 | -0.19 | -0.31 | -0.51 | -0.42 | -0.24 | -0.02 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.36 |
Yellow = optimal lag. Green/Red = significant positive/negative correlation.
CBRE shows strong negative correlation and responds immediately to unemployment changes.
Response Persistence
How long macro impacts persist after initial response.
| Company | Macro Variable | Peak Impact | Half-Life | Persistence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | RATES | 2Q | 3Q | Moderate |
| CBRE | CPI | 5Q | N/A | Unknown |
| CBRE | GDP | 6Q | N/A | Unknown |
| CBRE | UNEMPLOYMENT | 0Q | 2Q | Transient |
Scenario Analysis & Stress Testing
The scenario analysis projects CBRE’s revenue‑growth performance under four macroeconomic stress tests derived from historic episodes. Each scenario applies the ridge‑regression sensitivity coefficients to the macro shifts, yielding a point estimate and a 95 % confidence interval. The methodology assumes linear responses and flags low reliability where coefficient stability is weak.
Four scenarios are examined: a benign baseline, a mild stress mirroring early‑2022 conditions, a severe 2008‑style shock, and a 2022‑like rate shock. The macro shocks are anchored to actual historical periods – early 2022 tightening, the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, and the 2022 Fed tightening cycle – to give the tests economic grounding.
CBRE
CBRE’s revenue‑growth is projected to decline by only 0.05 percentage points in a 2022‑style rate shock but could fall by 0.42 percentage points under a 2008‑like severe stress, indicating a modest overall sensitivity range of 0.4 pp.
The dominant downside driver is the unemployment coefficient (‑0.126), which translates a 1‑point rise in unemployment into a 0.126 pp hit to growth. Rising rates also hurt, with a coefficient of ‑0.039, while higher inflation actually provides a modest boost (+0.040 per CPI point). GDP sensitivity (‑0.029) is comparatively muted.
Across the tested scenarios, CBRE exhibits the smallest projected revenue‑growth swing, implying it is among the less vulnerable real‑estate service firms to macroeconomic turbulence, especially compared to sectors with higher rate or GDP sensitivities.
Historical Stress Periods (Reference)
Scenarios are calibrated to historical stress events. These periods inform the magnitude of macro assumptions.
| Period | Rates | CPI | GDP | Unemployment | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2008 Financial Crisis
Sep 2008 - Mar 2009
|
-4.0pp | -4.5pp | -4.0pp | +5.0pp | -56.8% |
|
2020 COVID Crash
Feb 2020 - Apr 2020
|
-1.5pp | -1.5pp | -9.0pp | +11.0pp | -33.9% |
|
2022 Rate Tightening
Mar 2022 - Oct 2022
|
+4.2pp | +3.0pp | -0.5pp | +0.5pp | -25.4% |
Scenario Definitions
Baseline
BENIGNCurrent macro trajectory continues
| Interest Rates (Fed Funds) | No change |
| Inflation (CPI YoY) | No change |
| GDP Growth | No change |
| Unemployment Rate | No change |
Mild Stress
MILDModerate economic slowdown with rising rates
| Interest Rates (Fed Funds) | +1.0pp |
| Inflation (CPI YoY) | +1.0pp |
| GDP Growth | -1.0pp |
| Unemployment Rate | +1.0pp |
Severe Stress (2008-like)
SEVERESevere recession with deflationary pressures
| Interest Rates (Fed Funds) | -2.0pp |
| Inflation (CPI YoY) | -2.0pp |
| GDP Growth | -3.0pp |
| Unemployment Rate | +4.0pp |
Rate Shock (2022-like)
MODERATEAggressive rate tightening with persistent inflation
| Interest Rates (Fed Funds) | +2.0pp |
| Inflation (CPI YoY) | +2.0pp |
| GDP Growth | -0.5pp |
| Unemployment Rate | +0.5pp |
Company Stress Profiles
CBRE - CBRE Group, Inc.
Show scenario-by-scenario breakdown
| Scenario | Total Impact | 95% CI | Reliability | Primary Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | +0.00pp | (+0.0, +0.0) | low | None identified |
| Mild Stress | -0.10pp | (-0.2, -0.0) | low | Unemployment Rate |
| Severe Stress (2008-like) | -0.42pp | (-0.7, -0.1) | low | Unemployment Rate |
| Rate Shock (2022-like) | -0.05pp | (-0.1, +0.0) | low | Interest Rates (Fed Funds) |
Analysis date: 2026-04-01 | Data as of: 2026-03-01
Summary & Investment Implications
In an easing-rate, moderate-inflation environment (Fed Funds 3.64%, CPI 2.45% YoY), CBRE exhibits moderate macro sensitivity but a high degree of stress resilience, positioning it as a relatively defensive real‑estate services play amid uncertain macro shifts.
Macro Profile At a Glance
| Company | Macro Sensitivity | Regime Fit | Stress Resilience | Lowest Impact | Key Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
|
Moderate | Neutral | High |
-0.42pp
Severe Stress (2008-like)
|
cpi_rising |
Company Macro Assessments
CBRE's macro sensitivity is rated moderate and its fit to the current easing‑rate, moderate‑inflation regime is neutral. Stress‑scenario testing shows a maximum revenue‑growth drag of just -0.05pp under a 2022‑type rate shock and a low‑end impact of -0.42pp in a severe 2008‑like stress, indicating strong resilience. The key risk is a rise in CPI, while a falling CPI supports its outlook.
Investment Implications
Given the modest -0.05pp revenue‑growth impact from a rate shock, investors may consider a neutral‑to‑slight overweight stance on CBRE, treating it as a defensive holding that can weather modest rate hikes.
The moderate macro sensitivity combined with high stress resilience suggests CBRE can sustain its revenue trajectory even if inflation spikes temporarily, supporting a longer‑term hold rather than short‑term tactical trades.
Trading Considerations
Monitor monthly CPI releases; a sustained CPI rise above 2.5% could trigger the cpi_rising risk factor and pressure revenue growth.
Watch Fed Funds decisions for any shift from easing to tightening; a rate increase beyond 4.0% would test the -0.05pp rate‑shock impact and may prompt position adjustments.
Risk Watchlist
CPI upward deviation: if YoY CPI exceeds 2.8% for two consecutive months, the cpi_rising risk factor becomes material and may erode growth expectations.
Severe stress scenario: a sudden market shock resembling the 2008 crisis (e.g., sharp credit tightening) could push the revenue‑growth impact to -0.42pp, warranting a reassessment of the defensive thesis.
Key Takeaways
- CBRE’s revenue growth is minimally affected by typical rate shocks (-0.05pp).
- High stress resilience makes CBRE a defensive play in volatile macro environments.
- Rising CPI is the primary macro risk; falling CPI underpins its strength.
- Current estimates have low reliability—no robust regression or heuristic fallback—so investors should treat the numbers as indicative, not definitive.