Berkshire Hathaway's headline multiple profile is mixed. On one hand the common-price multiple (trailing P/E) is 16.2x, which is 29.3% below its five‑year average of 22.9x — by the report's rule that signals the stock is potentially undervalued versus its own history. On the other hand, enterprise-value based measures point the opposite direction: EV/EBITDA is 16.0x, materially above its five‑year average of 11.5x (about +39% versus its history) and 45.9% above the peer median of 11.0x. Book-value metrics are largely neutral: P/B is 1.51x versus a five‑year average of 1.39x and a peer median of 1.63x.
Compared with the eight peers in the sample, Berkshire carries a slight premium on earnings and a clear premium on EV/EBITDA (P/E +18.8% vs peer median; EV/EBITDA +45.9%), while its P/B is modestly below the peer median (-7.2%). The valuation trend is listed as contracting while the firm’s historical position remains a premium, which means the market has been moving Berkshire toward cheaper multiples relative to its past premium — a dynamic investors should interpret in light of company fundamentals (earnings durability, capital allocation track record, and balance‑sheet composition).
Key Findings
- P/E vs history: Trailing P/E of 16.2x is 29.3% below the 5‑year average (22.9x), indicating a potential discount relative to Berkshire’s own historical earnings multiple.
- EV/EBITDA premium: EV/EBITDA at 16.0x is substantially above both its 5‑year average (11.5x) and peer median (11.0x), implying the market is paying up for operating cash flow relative to peers or that enterprise value is elevated relative to EBITDA.
- Valuation trend & positioning: The trend is contracting while the stock remains historically a premium—this combination suggests a re‑rating is underway. That can present an opportunity if earnings are stable, or signal increased risk if the market is anticipating weaker future performance.
Company Valuation Highlights
BRK-B:
Berkshire shows a split signal. The trailing P/E of 16.2x is materially below its 5‑year average (22.9x), which by historical-comparison rules can be read as potentially undervalued versus its own history. However, EV/EBITDA at 16.0x is meaningfully above both its historical average (11.5x) and the peer median (11.0x), and P/E is ~18.8% higher than the peer median (13.6x) while P/B is slightly below peers (1.51x vs 1.63x). For investors this means: the market is giving Berkshire a lower earnings multiple than its own past (possible buying opportunity) but is paying a premium on enterprise cash‑flow measures (suggesting expectations for resilience or a higher structural valuation). Actionable next steps are to (a) validate the sustainability of reported earnings and cash flow, (b) examine balance‑sheet items and non‑operating assets that can distort EV metrics, and (c) decide whether you are buying an earnings multiple discount (if you trust earnings durability) or paying for superior underlying business quality despite contracting multiples.
| Company |
P/E |
Hist Avg |
Fwd P/E |
PEG |
P/B |
EV/EBITDA |
P/S |
Position |
| BRK-B |
16.2x |
22.9x |
23.0x |
N/A
|
1.51x |
16.0x |
2.92x |
Premium
|
Historical Percentile Position
Where current multiples sit relative to full historical range (higher percentile = more expensive vs history)
| Company |
P/E %ile |
P/E Range |
P/B %ile |
P/B Range |
EV/EBITDA %ile |
P/S %ile |
| BRK-B |
70th
|
6.8x - 125.2x
|
91th
|
1.25x - 1.51x
|
80th
|
91th
|
Peer Valuation Comparison
How each company's valuation compares to its industry peers
BRK-B vs 8 Peers
Slight Premium
P/E Ratio
16.2x
Peer Median: 13.6x
(+18.8%)
P/B Ratio
1.51x
Peer Median: 1.63x
(-7.2%)
EV/EBITDA
16.0x
Peer Median: 11.0x
(+45.9%)
P/S Ratio
2.92x
Peer Median: 1.39x
(+109.5%)
View all 8 peers
| Peer |
P/E |
P/B |
EV/EBITDA |
P/S |
Market Cap |
| BRK-B |
16.2x |
1.51x |
16.0x |
2.92x |
- |
| JPM |
13.9x |
2.18x |
11.3x |
2.73x |
$764.4B |
| SLF |
12.8x |
1.90x |
10.7x |
1.24x |
$47.7B |
| AIG |
13.4x |
1.01x |
6.4x |
1.55x |
$41.4B |
| BAC |
11.2x |
1.13x |
12.8x |
1.81x |
$341.2B |
| BNT |
16.2x |
0.71x |
3.0x |
1.09x |
$12.5B |
| V |
28.3x |
15.16x |
22.5x |
14.31x |
$592.2B |
| PFG |
16.1x |
1.61x |
13.2x |
1.21x |
$18.9B |
| ORI |
10.4x |
1.65x |
9.2x |
1.08x |
$9.9B |
| Peer Median |
13.6x |
1.63x |
11.0x |
1.39x |
- |
Berkshire Hathaway’s reported enterprise value (EV) of $1.17 trillion is overwhelmingly equity‑driven: market capitalization of $1.06 trillion represents roughly 90.5% of EV, while net debt of $87.1 billion accounts for about 7.5%. On a gross basis, total debt is $138.95 billion (≈11.9% of EV) offset by cash of $51.9 billion (≈4.4% of EV). By construction, EV = market cap + net debt, so Berkshire’s EV composition highlights a dominant equity claim with a modest net debt load and a meaningful cash cushion at the holding company level.
Berkshire’s headline EV multiples are EV/EBITDA = 16.0x and EV/Sales = 3.15x, and net leverage is Net Debt/EBITDA = 1.19x (classified “Moderate”). Because the dataset contains only Berkshire, we cannot produce cross‑company multiples within this portfolio; however these metrics can be interpreted on their own. An EV/EBITDA of 16.0x means investors are paying sixteen times annual EBITDA for the enterprise cash flows, while an EV/Sales of 3.15x shows the market values the company at just over three times its revenue. The net leverage ratio near 1.2x signals conservative financing relative to many industrials and is consistent with the portfolio-level “Moderate” leverage classification.
Key Findings
- Enterprise value composition: Berkshire’s EV is predominantly equity-financed — market cap ($1.06T) makes up ~90.5% of EV, with net debt at $87.08B (~7.5%). Gross debt ($138.95B) is partially offset by cash ($51.88B), leaving a modest net liability position.
- Valuation signals: EV/EBITDA of 16.0x and EV/Sales of 3.15x place Berkshire in a mid-to-upper valuation band for a large, diversified conglomerate. Without peer or historical 5‑year multiple comparisons in the dataset, these multiples are inconclusive on their own; they warrant a follow-up DCF or peer analysis to determine whether the stock is undervalued or overvalued by the report’s stated thresholds.
- Capital structure and flexibility: Net Debt/EBITDA of 1.19x and a sizable cash balance indicate moderate leverage and strong financial flexibility. This supports capacity for opportunistic capital deployment (acquisitions, repurchases, or absorbing insurance claim volatility), but attention should be paid to debt maturities, interest expense trends, and insurance‑related liabilities not captured in these headline ratios.
Leverage Assessment
Portfolio-level leverage is moderate — the single holding (Berkshire B) is classified as 'Moderate' with Net Debt/EBITDA = 1.19x. The equity-heavy EV structure (market cap ~90.5% of EV) and $51.9B of cash provide a sizable liquidity buffer and low net financial risk relative to more indebted corporates. Actionable next steps: (1) run a DCF to test valuation against the report’s >15% upside/downside thresholds, (2) compare Berkshire’s EV/EBITDA and EV/Sales to direct conglomerate and insurance peers and to its own 5‑year averages, and (3) review the debt maturity schedule, effective interest rates, and insurance float dynamics to ensure the 'Moderate' classification remains appropriate under stress scenarios.
| Company |
Market Cap |
EV |
Net Debt |
EV/EBITDA |
Hist Avg |
EV/Sales |
EV/FCF |
Leverage |
| BRK-B |
$1.06T |
$1.17T |
$87.08B
|
16.0x |
11.5x |
3.15x |
46.8x |
Moderate
|
Leverage Analysis
| Company |
Net Debt/EBITDA |
Hist Avg |
Hist Range |
Debt % of EV |
Leverage Tier |
| BRK-B |
1.19x
|
1.14x |
0.11x - 3.81x
|
11.9% |
Moderate
|
The DCF analysis for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) reflects the interaction of a changing rate environment, Berkshire’s uneven recent free cash flow (FCF) trend, and the company's unique capital-deployment profile. Using a 10-year Treasury rate of 4.28%, a BAA credit spread of 1.62% (resulting in a dynamic equity risk premium of 3.12%) and a WACC of 6.22%, the model applies a sector terminal growth of 2.5% for financials. Those inputs produce a Historical DCF per-share of $360.47 (26.8% below the current market price of $492.27) and a lower Analyst DCF of $295.35 (40.0% below the market price), leading to the conclusion that BRK-B is currently priced materially above intrinsic value by both DCF methods.
Historically low interest rates (the 2015–2021 period) supported strong appreciation in public equities and in the market value of Berkshire’s large investment portfolio; that helped reported book value and investment income. The rapid normalization and hikes in 2022–2023 (Fed funds rising to a peak and 10Y Treasury moving to 4.28%) reversed some of those gains by compressing equity multiples, while higher yields improved reinvestment prospects for Berkshire’s large insurance float. The DCF reflects those regime shifts: a higher risk-free rate and an above-zero dynamic ERP increase the discount rate (WACC = 6.22%), which reduces present value of future FCF compared with the low-rate era.
Key Findings
- Both DCF methods indicate that BRK-B is meaningfully overvalued versus intrinsic value: Historical DCF = $360.47 (-26.8% vs market), Analyst DCF = $295.35 (-40.0% vs market). Under the report’s rule (DCF downside > 15% = overvalued), BRK-B is significantly overvalued.
- Historical vs Analyst DCF divergence (Historical higher at $360.47 vs Analyst $295.35) reflects different growth assumptions: the Historical DCF uses the 10-year FCF CAGR of 5.0% and therefore captures longer-term realized growth, while the Analyst DCF uses near-term analyst revenue trajectories and historical FCF margins (which embed recent weakness—5-year FCF CAGR is -1.3%) leading to a substantially lower forward FCF profile.
- Buybacks provide a modest tailwind to per-share intrinsic value (historical buyback rate ~2.5%/yr reduces shares outstanding), but this is not enough to close the gap between market price and DCF values. Investors should require clear evidence of sustained FCF improvement, a step-up in buyback cadence above historical 2.5%/yr, or a narrowing of the risk premium to justify the current price.
DCF Verdicts by Company
BRK-B:
Significantly overvalued. The Historical DCF ($360.47) and the more conservative Analyst DCF ($295.35) are 26.8% and 40.0% below the current price of $492.27, respectively. Key drivers: (1) higher discount rates (10Y = 4.28%) and a dynamic ERP of 3.12% push WACC to 6.22%, reducing present value; (2) recent FCF weakness (5Y CAGR -1.3%) versus a longer-run 10Y CAGR of 5.0% creates tension between backward-looking and forward-looking scenarios; (3) buybacks (historical 2.5%/yr) raise per-share intrinsic value but not enough to offset the valuation gap. Actionable guidance: Avoid initiating a sizable new position at the current price if your allocation is sensitive to valuation; consider waiting for price to approach the Historical DCF (~$360) for a more conservative entry or the Analyst DCF (~$295) for a margin-of-safety oriented entry. Monitor catalysts that could narrow the gap: sustained FCF recovery, materially higher buyback rates, outsized returns on invested capital from new deployments, or a persistent compression in credit spreads (which would lower the ERP). Acknowledge counterarguments: the market may be pricing in intangible value (managerial optionality, future M&A deployment, and the investment portfolio’s upside) that the DCF does not fully capture; investors who accept those narratives should still size positions with that additional valuation risk in mind.
Risk-Free Rate (10Y Treasury):
4.28%
Market Risk Premium:
3.12%
BAA Spread:
1.62%
Terminal Growth Rate:
Varies by sector (2.0% - 3.5%)
Methodology Note:
- Market Risk Premium: Calculated dynamically based on credit spreads.
Formula:
ERP = 3.0% + (BAA Spread - 1.5%).
When spreads are tight, ERP is lower; when spreads widen, ERP increases.
- Terminal Growth Rate: Sector-based assumptions:
Technology, Communication Services: 3.5% |
Healthcare, Consumer Cyclical: 3.0% |
Industrials, Financials, Consumer Defensive, Materials: 2.5% |
Energy, Utilities, Real Estate: 2.0%
- Shares Outstanding: Adjusted for historical buyback trends when applicable.
| Company |
Current Price |
Historical DCF |
Upside |
Analyst DCF |
Upside |
Verdict |
| BRK-B |
$492.27 |
$360.47 |
-26.8%
|
$295.35 |
-40.0%
|
Significantly Overvalued
|
BRK-B – Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
WACC Calculation
| Risk-Free Rate (Rf) |
4.28% |
| Beta (β) |
0.69 |
| Market Risk Premium |
5.50% |
| Cost of Equity (Ke = Rf + β × MRP) |
6.43% |
| Cost of Debt (after-tax) |
4.66% |
| WACC |
6.22% |
Historical Free Cash Flow
| Metric |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
| FCF ($B) |
$26.1B |
$21.8B |
$29.8B |
$11.6B |
$25.0B |
| FCF Margin (%) |
7.4% |
9.3% |
6.8% |
3.1% |
6.7% |
FCF CAGRs:
5Y: -1.3% |
10Y: 5.0%
| Avg FCF Margin (5Y): 6.7%
DCF Valuation (Two Methods)
| Component |
Historical Method (10Y CAGR projection) |
Analyst Method (Revenue × FCF Margin) |
| Growth Assumption |
5.0% (10Y CAGR) |
Analyst Revenue Est. × 6.7% margin |
| PV of Projected FCF |
$120.87B |
$107.58B |
| Terminal Value |
$879.09B |
$729.98B |
| PV of Terminal Value |
$650.06B |
$539.80B |
| Enterprise Value |
$770.93B |
$647.38B |
| (-) Net Debt |
$87.08B |
$87.08B |
| Equity Value |
$683.85B |
$560.30B |
| Intrinsic Value per Share |
$360.47 |
$295.35 |
| vs Current Price ($492.27) |
-26.8%
|
-40.0%
|
Sensitivity Analysis (Historical Method)
Intrinsic value per share varying WACC and Terminal Growth Rate
| WACC ↓ / TG → |
1.5% |
2.0% |
2.5% |
3.0% |
3.5% |
| 4.2% |
$537
|
$657
|
$848
|
$1197
|
$2047
|
| 5.2% |
$378
|
$436
|
$515
|
$631
|
$815
|
| 6.2% |
$287
|
$320
|
$363
|
$419
|
$495
|
| 7.2% |
$228
|
$249
|
$275
|
$308
|
$349
|
| 8.2% |
$186
|
$201
|
$218
|
$239
|
$264
|
Current price: $492.27 | Highlighted row shows base case WACC (6.22%)
Verdict:
Significantly Overvalued
(Combined upside: -33.4%, DCF Confidence: High)
DCF Summary Comparison
| Company |
Current Price |
Historical DCF |
Analyst DCF |
Combined Upside |
Verdict |
| BRK-B |
$492.27 |
$360.47
(-26.8%)
|
$295.35
(-40.0%)
|
-33.4%
|
Significantly Overvalued
|
Analyst coverage of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK‑B) is limited and neutral. The three analysts covering the stock have a consensus price target of $465.50, which is 5.4% below the current share price of $492.27 and is reflected in a single sentiment of 'Hold.' Targets have been described as stable with no meaningful upward or downward trend available, indicating no recent shift in analyst conviction or a lack of material new information prompting revisions.
The forward multiple profile is more informative than the target trend. Trailing P/E is 15.9x while the forward P/E rises to 23.0x (a 44.8% increase). That change is driven primarily by a materially lower forward EPS estimate of $21.43 versus an implied trailing EPS of roughly $30.96 (492.27 / 15.9). In plain terms, analysts are forecasting a roughly 31% decline in reported EPS, which pushes the forward P/E higher despite the stable price-target picture. For investors, this combination — modest analyst downside on price targets plus an expected drop in EPS — signals caution and a need to understand the drivers of the projected earnings decline before making allocation decisions.
Key Findings
- Consensus target ($465.50) implies limited near-term upside: −5.4% from the current price; the range spans $450.00 (−8.6%) to $481.00 (−2.3%).
- Forward P/E expansion from 15.9x (TTM) to 23.0x reflects a ~31% decline in implied EPS (from ≈$30.96 trailing to $21.43 forward); this is a substantive change in earnings expectations and a potential red flag to investigate.
- Analyst coverage is thin (3 analysts) but the target range is relatively tight (a $31 spread, ~6.7% of the consensus target), which implies modest agreement among a small group — limited conviction overall.
Price Target Trend Analysis
Analyst targets are effectively stable with no directional trend reported; the steady consensus target and the 'Hold' sentiment suggest analysts see BRK‑B as fairly valued or lacking clear catalysts. The consensus target sits below the market price (−5.4%), and the target range ($450–$481) is relatively narrow, indicating analytical agreement on a modest downside scenario. However, coverage is light (three analysts), so the absence of target movement could reflect low analyst engagement rather than strong conviction. Actionable next steps: investors should seek clarity on the assumptions driving the target — especially expectations for investment income and one‑time items — and confirm whether a firm DCF or scenario analysis supports the prevailing target range before changing position sizing.
P/E Trajectory Analysis
The rise in P/E from 15.9x (TTM) to 23.0x (forward) is not a sign of increased optimism about growth; it principally reflects lower forecasted EPS (forward EPS $21.43 vs implied trailing EPS ≈$30.96). A higher forward P/E in the face of falling EPS typically signals expected earnings weakness or the loss of prior one‑off gains. For investors this means: (a) validate the expected earnings decline — determine if it is temporary (non‑recurring items) or structural, and (b) adjust valuation methods accordingly. If a formal DCF (not provided here) yields an upside greater than 15%, that would argue the market/analysts are too pessimistic; conversely, a DCF downside greater than 15% would reinforce the view implied by the higher forward P/E. Given the magnitude of the EPS deterioration baked into the forward multiple, the priority is to reconcile accounting and investment income assumptions behind the forecasts before treating the current multiple profile as attractive.
Analyst Price Targets
| Company |
Current Price |
Target Consensus |
Target Low |
Target High |
Upside |
Analysts |
Sentiment |
| BRK-B |
$492.27 |
$465.50 |
$450.00 |
$481.00 |
-5.4%
|
3 |
Hold
|
Forward Estimates & P/E Comparison
Comparing trailing (TTM) vs forward P/E reveals market expectations for earnings growth
| Company |
Forward EPS |
Forward Revenue |
TTM P/E |
Forward P/E |
P/E Change |
Estimate Year |
| BRK-B |
$21.43 |
$395.27B |
15.9x |
23.0x |
+44.8%
(Earnings declining)
|
FY2027 |
Reading P/E Change: Negative change (TTM P/E > Forward P/E) suggests analysts expect earnings growth.
Positive change indicates earnings may decline. Large differences warrant investigation into the growth story.
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) presents a mixed but overall cautious valuation picture. Six standard methods produce implied values from $235.02 to $530.73 with a median implied value of $346.09, which is 29.7% below the current share price of $492.27. Five of the six methods (P/E peer: $292.18, EV/EBITDA peer: $331.71, P/S peer: $235.02, DCF: $360.47, and the median) imply material downside versus today’s market price; only the P/B peer method ($530.73) suggests a modest premium (+7.8%). The Wall Street analyst consensus price ($465.50) sits slightly below the market (-5.4%), implying limited upside from current levels per prevailing sell‑side expectations.
Interpreting the metrics: P/E and EV/EBITDA focus on profitability and operating cash generation and both point to substantial downside (–40.6% and –32.6% respectively), indicating the market is pricing a much higher multiple of earnings/operating cash than comparable peers justify. P/S produces the lowest implied value ($235.02, –52.3%), signaling a low revenue‑relative valuation using peer sales multiples. The DCF result ($360.47, –26.8%) — which projects Berkshire’s free cash flow from revenues — also implies the stock is meaningfully overvalued versus intrinsic discounted cash flow. The lone outlier, P/B, reflects Berkshire’s substantial book value and insurance float; that metric supports a value slightly above the market. The broad dispersion across methods (range ~ $296) flags meaningful valuation uncertainty tied to accounting treatment, capital allocation assumptions and the mix of operating vs investment income in Berkshire’s results.
Key Takeaways
- Most valuation approaches (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S and DCF) indicate Berkshire is trading materially above fair value — the median implied price ($346.09) is ~30% below today’s quote.
- P/B is the outlier: Berkshire’s large equity base and insurance float push the book‑value‑based method to $530.73, suggesting investor preference matters — balance‑sheet focused buyers may tolerate a premium while earnings/cashflow multiples do not.
- Wide dispersion across methods (low $235 to high $531) implies high valuation uncertainty; investors should weigh which metric best matches their investment thesis (book‑value orientation vs earnings/cashflow orientation) and manage position size accordingly.
Investment Implications
For value-oriented investors who prioritize earnings and cash flow, the multi‑method analysis argues for caution or a wait‑for‑entry approach. The median implied value ($346.09) and DCF ($360.47) indicate downside of roughly 26–30% from the current price; these are the most direct measures of intrinsic and operating performance and suggest the stock is overvalued at $492.27. The P/S result ($235.02) reinforces the view that revenue‑relative multiples do not support today’s price.
That said, investors who prioritize balance‑sheet strength and long‑term optionality (insurance float, large equity portfolio, conservative capital allocation) may place more weight on the P/B outcome ($530.73). In that narrower, book‑value‑oriented view the stock looks reasonably priced or only modestly expensive. Wall Street’s consensus ($465.50) sits between these poles, implying limited near‑term upside in sell‑side estimates.
Actionable guidance: avoid initiating a full position at current levels if your primary valuation anchor is earnings or cash flows; consider setting a target entry in the $340–$370 range aligned with the median and DCF results, or use phased purchases (dollar‑cost averaging) to limit timing risk. If you are a long‑term investor who values Berkshire’s capital allocation track record and balance sheet, a smaller initial allocation is defensible, but monitor catalysts that could justify the premium (sustained outperformance of the investment portfolio, accelerated buybacks, or material improvements in operating margins). Because the valuation methods disagree materially, use position sizing and a clearly defined target or stop policy rather than treating the current price as a clear buy.
Comprehensive Valuation Summary
Aggregated implied values from multiple valuation methods: P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA, P/S (peer-based), DCF, and Analyst Targets
| Company |
Current Price |
Valuation Range |
Median Value |
Median Upside |
Methods |
Consensus |
| BRK-B |
$492.27 |
$235.02 - $530.73
|
$346.09 |
-29.7%
|
6 |
Overvalued
|
Valuation Details by Method
Implied values from each valuation methodology for individual companies
BRK-B – Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Current: $492.27
Overvalued
| Method |
Implied Value |
Upside/Downside |
Basis |
| P/E (Peer) |
$292.18 |
-40.6%
|
Peer median P/E (13.6x) × Forward EPS ($21.43) |
| P/B (Peer) |
$530.73 |
+7.8%
|
Peer median P/B (1.63x) × Book Value per Share |
| EV/EBITDA (Peer) |
$331.71 |
-32.6%
|
Peer median EV/EBITDA (11.0x) × EBITDA - Net Debt |
| P/S (Peer) |
$235.02 |
-52.3%
|
Peer median P/S (1.39x) × Revenue per Share |
| DCF |
$360.47 |
-26.8%
|
Revenue × FCF Margin projection |
| Analyst Target |
$465.50 |
-5.4%
|
Consensus of 3 analysts |
| Median |
$346.09 |
-29.7%
|
Based on 6 methods |