Executive Summary

The aerospace portfolio, comprised of GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace, demonstrates robust operational health characterized by an average TTM ROE of 35.9% and an impressive average ROIC of 24.8%. While HWM continues to outperform the S&P 500 with a 4.8% YTD return, GE has entered a period of technical consolidation, trading 11.7% below its 52-week high with a bearish RSI of 35. Despite this divergence, the portfolio's negative Cash Conversion Cycle (-28 days) and strong Piotroski F-Score of 7.0 underscore a foundation of high earnings quality and efficient capital management. Investors are currently navigating a high-valuation regime, reflected in an average EV/EBITDA of 35.8x, which demands sustained double-digit growth to justify current premiums.

Key Takeaways

Current Snapshot (TTM)

35.9%
Avg ROE
24.8%
Avg ROIC
1.70x
Avg Current Ratio
$426.5B
Total Market Cap

3A Core Financial History & Growth Analysis

Against a backdrop of a mild bull market with the S&P 500 near all-time highs, aerospace leaders GE and Howmet demonstrate resilient top-line expansion fueled by robust commercial aviation demand. While the portfolio maintains a combined revenue base of $46.1 billion, divergent short-term momentum highlights a shifting preference for Howmet’s higher-alpha growth profile.

GE Aerospace, now operating as a focused pure-play entity, has delivered a respectable 9.5% YoY revenue increase, yet its stock has recently entered a consolidation phase, retreating 11.7% from its 52-week high. This 1-month underperformance of 7.2% relative to the S&P 500 suggests investors are recalibrating expectations for the aerospace giant amidst elevated 20D volatility of 39.5%. Despite the recent bearish RSI of 35, GE's 1-year return of 56.7% underscores a successful long-term structural turnaround that remains supported by a bullish golden cross technical signal. In contrast, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) currently serves as the portfolio's primary growth engine, posting an 11.9% YoY revenue increase that places it in the high-growth category. This superior expansion has translated into a 1-month outperformance of 2.7% over the S&P 500, with the stock trading at the 90th percentile of its 52-week range. The market is clearly rewarding HWM’s consistent execution and its critical role in the engine supply chain, as evidenced by its 70.0% return over the past year, significantly outstripping GE’s performance in the same period.

Key Findings

  • Portfolio average revenue growth of 10.7% is effectively synchronized with the 10.1% average earnings growth, suggesting stable margins across the sector.
  • Howmet's 11.9% YoY growth has propelled it to a 105.0% gain from its 52-week low, doubling the performance of many industrial peers.
  • GE's moderate 9.5% growth is currently being tested by the market, with a 6.6% decline over the last month signaling a potential valuation reset.
  • An average ROIC of 24.8% across both firms indicates that growth is being achieved with high capital efficiency, well above the cost of capital.

Company Highlights

GE: While GE's 9.5% YoY growth is solid, its recent 8.1% weekly decline and elevated 39.5% volatility suggest a period of price discovery following its spin-off transition.
HWM: Howmet is the momentum leader, combining 11.9% YoY growth with a neutral RSI of 54, suggesting its 70% annual gain is supported by fundamental strength rather than overextension.

Growth Quality Assessment

The quality of growth is exceptionally high, evidenced by an average Income Quality ratio of 1.06 and a robust 35.9% ROE. These metrics suggest that earnings are fully backed by cash flow and that both companies are successfully leveraging their dominant market positions to maintain pricing power.

Company Latest Revenue Net Income Net Margin FCF Years
GE GE Aerospace $38.7B $6.6B 16.9% $3.7B 10
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. $7.4B $1.2B 15.5% $977M 10
Company Revenue YoY Earnings YoY 3Y CAGR 5Y CAGR Trend Classification
GE 9.5% -30.9% -11.8% -15.6% Accelerating Moderate Growth
HWM 11.9% 51.0% 14.3% 0.9% Decelerating Moderate Growth

Multi-Year Financial Performance

GE - GE Aerospace
Year Revenue Net Income Gross Margin Net Margin ROE FCF
2024 $38,702M $6,556M 37.2% 16.9% 33.9% $3,678M
2023 $35,348M $9,482M 35.1% 26.8% 34.6% $3,584M
2022 $29,139M $336M 34.8% 1.2% 1.0% $4,742M
2021 $56,469M $-6,337M 23.2% -11.2% -15.7% $2,368M
2020 $75,834M $5,704M 23.7% 7.5% 16.0% $194M
2019 $90,221M $-4,979M 28.1% -5.5% -17.6% $2,677M
2018 $97,012M $-22,355M 28.5% -23.0% -72.2% $-3,810M
2017 $99,279M $-8,484M 23.9% -8.5% -15.1% $2,506M
2016 $119,468M $7,500M 26.6% 6.3% 9.9% $-7,443M
2015 $115,158M $-6,126M 28.2% -5.3% -6.2% $12,582M
HWM - Howmet Aerospace Inc.
Year Revenue Net Income Gross Margin Net Margin ROE FCF
2024 $7,430M $1,155M 27.6% 15.5% 25.4% $977M
2023 $6,640M $765M 24.3% 11.5% 18.9% $682M
2022 $5,663M $469M 23.9% 8.3% 13.0% $540M
2021 $4,972M $258M 22.8% 5.2% 7.4% $250M
2020 $5,259M $211M 21.7% 4.0% 5.9% $-258M
2019 $7,098M $470M 22.8% 6.6% 10.2% $-180M
2018 $14,022M $642M 14.6% 4.6% 11.5% $-551M
2017 $12,962M $-74M 16.9% -0.6% -1.5% $105M
2016 $12,393M $-941M 16.9% -7.6% -18.3% $-252M
2015 $12,392M $-322M 14.3% -2.6% -2.7% $402M

Growth Quality Assessment

The quality of growth is exceptionally high, evidenced by an average Income Quality ratio of 1.06 and a robust 35.9% ROE. These metrics suggest that earnings are fully backed by cash flow and that both companies are successfully leveraging their dominant market positions to maintain pricing power.

GE

While GE's 9.5% YoY growth is solid, its recent 8.1% weekly decline and elevated 39.5% volatility suggest a period of price discovery following its spin-off transition.

HWM

Howmet is the momentum leader, combining 11.9% YoY growth with a neutral RSI of 54, suggesting its 70% annual gain is supported by fundamental strength rather than overextension.

3B Comprehensive Financial Visualization Suite

This visualization suite highlights the divergence between GE Aerospace’s post-spin-off operational recalibration and Howmet’s steady structural growth within the aerospace supply chain. The charts reveal how both firms are navigating a high-demand environment while maintaining a robust portfolio average ROE of 35.9%.

Revenue

Revenue charts highlight a robust recovery in commercial aftermarket demand, with GE's top-line reflecting its pure-play aerospace focus and Howmet capturing increasing shipset value per aircraft. Despite recent price volatility, the long-term revenue trajectories remain supported by record industry backlogs.

Advanced

Advanced metrics, including the 35.8x average EV/EBITDA, underscore the premium valuation the market assigns to these mission-critical suppliers. The charts contrast GE’s elevated 20-day volatility (39.5%) against Howmet’s more stable technical profile.

Cash Flow

These visualizations track the translation of high-quality earnings—evidenced by a portfolio income quality ratio of 1.06—into free cash flow. This liquidity is essential for funding the intensive R&D required for next-generation engine programs like the RISE technology demonstrator.

Comparative

Cross-company comparisons show HWM outperforming GE on a YTD basis (+4.8% vs -4.6%), illustrating a market preference for Howmet’s consistent execution. These charts help investors weigh GE’s high-beta recovery potential against Howmet’s steady outperformance of the S&P 500.

Balance Sheet

Balance sheet trends reveal a disciplined approach to leverage and capital allocation, with both firms maintaining the liquidity necessary to navigate ongoing supply chain constraints. The data shows how GE and HWM have supported significant 1-year returns of 56.7% and 70.0%, respectively, through strengthened financial positions.

Profitability

The margin expansion story is central here, as Howmet leverages its proprietary casting technology while GE optimizes its services-heavy mix to maintain high profitability. The visualizations track how these firms achieve an average ROIC of 24.8%, significantly outperforming broader industrial averages.

Revenue

Revenue charts highlight a robust recovery in commercial aftermarket demand, with GE's top-line reflecting its pure-play aerospace focus and Howmet capturing increasing shipset value per aircraft. Despite recent price volatility, the long-term revenue trajectories remain supported by record industry backlogs.

Advanced

Advanced metrics, including the 35.8x average EV/EBITDA, underscore the premium valuation the market assigns to these mission-critical suppliers. The charts contrast GE’s elevated 20-day volatility (39.5%) against Howmet’s more stable technical profile.

Cash Flow

These visualizations track the translation of high-quality earnings—evidenced by a portfolio income quality ratio of 1.06—into free cash flow. This liquidity is essential for funding the intensive R&D required for next-generation engine programs like the RISE technology demonstrator.

Comparative

Cross-company comparisons show HWM outperforming GE on a YTD basis (+4.8% vs -4.6%), illustrating a market preference for Howmet’s consistent execution. These charts help investors weigh GE’s high-beta recovery potential against Howmet’s steady outperformance of the S&P 500.

Balance Sheet

Balance sheet trends reveal a disciplined approach to leverage and capital allocation, with both firms maintaining the liquidity necessary to navigate ongoing supply chain constraints. The data shows how GE and HWM have supported significant 1-year returns of 56.7% and 70.0%, respectively, through strengthened financial positions.

Profitability

The margin expansion story is central here, as Howmet leverages its proprietary casting technology while GE optimizes its services-heavy mix to maintain high profitability. The visualizations track how these firms achieve an average ROIC of 24.8%, significantly outperforming broader industrial averages.

Visualizations

3C Working Capital Management & Operational Efficiency

Operational efficiency remains a critical differentiator in the aerospace sector, where managing complex supply chains directly impacts free cash flow and valuation. Current metrics reveal a significant pivot toward negative cash conversion cycles, indicating that both GE Aerospace and Howmet are effectively leveraging supplier terms to fund their operational growth.

Despite a challenging TTM backdrop where the portfolio's Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) averaged 126 days—a 154-day deterioration from historical norms—current snapshots show a remarkable recovery in operational velocity. Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads the peer group with a CCC of -37 days and a robust asset turnover of 0.71x, reflecting superior supply chain synchronization that has likely contributed to its 4.8% YTD outperformance relative to the S&P 500. GE Aerospace, while trailing HWM in asset turnover at 0.31x, still maintains an efficient CCC of -20 days, suggesting that even as its stock faces short-term technical pressure with an RSI of 35, the underlying operational engine remains lean and cash-generative. The divergence in liquidity profiles is a key factor for the next 6-18 months; HWM maintains a 'Strong' current ratio of 2.17, providing a substantial cushion for capital reinvestment or debt servicing. Conversely, GE’s current ratio of 1.09 is classified as 'Adequate' but leaves less room for maneuver in a high-volatility environment where its 20D volatility has spiked to 39.5%. For investors, the primary focus is whether these companies can sustain these negative CCC levels as global aerospace production rates continue to normalize and inventory requirements evolve.

Key Findings

  • Howmet's 0.71x asset turnover is more than double GE's 0.31x, indicating significantly higher revenue generation per dollar of deployed assets.
  • The portfolio's current -28 day CCC represents a sharp reversal from the TTM average of 126 days, signaling a recent and aggressive optimization of working capital components.
  • HWM's 2.17 current ratio provides a 99% higher liquidity margin than GE's 1.09, marking it as the more conservative choice for risk-averse investors.

Company Highlights

GE: GE Aerospace maintains an efficient -20 day CCC, though its 0.31x asset turnover and 1.09 current ratio suggest a leaner operational model that requires precise execution as it settles into its pure-play aerospace structure.
HWM: Howmet stands out with an aggressive -37 day CCC and a high 0.71x asset turnover, metrics that underscore its operational excellence and justify its 70.0% price appreciation over the past year.

Efficiency Assessment

The aerospace duo exhibits strong current operational efficiency characterized by negative CCCs, though the TTM data suggests significant historical volatility in working capital. HWM is currently the efficiency leader, outclassing GE in both asset velocity and short-term liquidity headroom.

Company Working Capital Current Ratio CCC (Days) Asset Turnover
GE $3.2B 1.09x -20 0.31x
HWM $1.8B 2.17x -37 0.71x

Efficiency Assessment

The aerospace duo exhibits strong current operational efficiency characterized by negative CCCs, though the TTM data suggests significant historical volatility in working capital. HWM is currently the efficiency leader, outclassing GE in both asset velocity and short-term liquidity headroom.

GE

GE Aerospace maintains an efficient -20 day CCC, though its 0.31x asset turnover and 1.09 current ratio suggest a leaner operational model that requires precise execution as it settles into its pure-play aerospace structure.

HWM

Howmet stands out with an aggressive -37 day CCC and a high 0.71x asset turnover, metrics that underscore its operational excellence and justify its 70.0% price appreciation over the past year.

3D Capital Allocation & Return Analysis

In the capital-intensive aerospace and defense sector, the ability to generate returns above the cost of capital is the primary driver of long-term shareholder value. Both GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace demonstrate robust capital allocation strategies, maintaining positive spreads between their Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC).

The aerospace industry currently operates within a regime of high demand and persistent supply chain constraints, placing a premium on operational efficiency and capital discipline. GE Aerospace (GE) and Howmet Aerospace (HWM) both function as high-tier 'Value Creators,' with an average portfolio ROIC of 18.9% significantly exceeding the estimated WACC of 9.8%. While the TTM ROIC of 24.8% suggests a slight cooling from recent historical peaks, the current portfolio spread of +9.2% remains exceptionally healthy compared to broader industrial averages, signaling that management teams are successfully compounding wealth. Market performance has diverged recently, with HWM outperforming the S&P 500 by 9.2% over the last three months, while GE has faced an 8.1% weekly decline. This divergence highlights a market that is becoming more selective about valuation premiums. However, the underlying capital metrics remain strong; the portfolio's average ROE of 29.6% demonstrates that even with recent volatility, these companies are delivering substantial returns to equity holders through efficient asset utilization and strategic leverage.

Key Findings

  • Both companies are confirmed 'Value Creators' with ROIC-WACC spreads exceeding 600 basis points.
  • Howmet Aerospace exhibits superior capital efficiency with a 20.8% ROIC, the highest in this peer group.
  • The portfolio maintains a healthy 1.06 Income Quality ratio, suggesting that reported earnings are well-supported by cash flows.
  • Average ROE has normalized to 29.6% from a TTM high of 35.9%, reflecting a stabilization in the post-spinoff aerospace environment.

Company Highlights

GE: GE Aerospace leverages its dominant service franchise to maintain a 33.9% ROE; however, its recent RSI of 35 and 11.7% drop from 52-week highs suggest the market is re-evaluating its premium despite a healthy 6.5% WACC spread.
HWM: Howmet’s impressive 11.8% ROIC-WACC spread underscores its immense pricing power in critical aerospace components, supporting its year-over-year return of 70.0% and its position near 52-week highs.

Value Creation Assessment

The portfolio generates a substantial +9.2% ROIC-WACC spread, confirming that both GE and HWM are fundamentally compounding shareholder wealth. This consistent value creation justifies the premium TTM EV/EBITDA multiple of 35.8x, as investors continue to pay for high-quality, capital-efficient growth.

Company ROIC ROE ROA D/E WACC Spread
GE 17.0% 33.9% 5.2% 1.05x 6.5%
HWM 20.8% 25.4% 11.0% 0.76x 11.8%

Value Creation Assessment

The portfolio generates a substantial +9.2% ROIC-WACC spread, confirming that both GE and HWM are fundamentally compounding shareholder wealth. This consistent value creation justifies the premium TTM EV/EBITDA multiple of 35.8x, as investors continue to pay for high-quality, capital-efficient growth.

GE

GE Aerospace leverages its dominant service franchise to maintain a 33.9% ROE; however, its recent RSI of 35 and 11.7% drop from 52-week highs suggest the market is re-evaluating its premium despite a healthy 6.5% WACC spread.

HWM

Howmet’s impressive 11.8% ROIC-WACC spread underscores its immense pricing power in critical aerospace components, supporting its year-over-year return of 70.0% and its position near 52-week highs.

3E Financial Quality & Earnings Analysis

As the aerospace sector navigates supply chain volatility and production ramp-ups, the quality of reported earnings becomes a critical differentiator for investors. This analysis evaluates whether GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace are generating 'true' profits backed by cash flow or relying on accounting accruals to meet expectations.

The portfolio exhibits a bifurcated quality profile, characterized by an average Piotroski F-Score of 7.0, which indicates generally robust financial health across nine fundamental dimensions including profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency. However, a closer look at the cash-backing metrics reveals a disconnect between net income and operating cash flow (OCF). With an average OCF/NI ratio of 0.92, the portfolio currently falls short of the ideal 1.0 threshold, suggesting that roughly 8% of reported earnings are not yet realized as cash, a factor that contributes to the elevated 33.4% average volatility seen across these names. Despite the lag in cash conversion, the underlying accounting remains conservative. The average accruals ratio of 0.014 is well within the healthy range (below 0.05), suggesting that the earnings reported are not being artificially inflated by aggressive accounting maneuvers. This structural integrity is particularly evident in Howmet Aerospace (HWM), which maintains a negative accruals ratio, a hallmark of high-quality earnings that typically precedes continued stock outperformance.

Key Findings

  • Howmet Aerospace achieves a perfect 9/9 Piotroski F-Score, indicating peak operational and financial efficiency.
  • The portfolio's average OCF/NI ratio of 0.92 suggests that 8% of aggregate earnings are not currently backed by hard cash flow.
  • HWM’s negative accruals ratio (-0.014) indicates conservative accounting practices, which often correlate with lower earnings risk.
  • GE Aerospace’s moderate 5/9 F-Score highlights potential areas for improvement in leverage and liquidity post-separation.

Company Highlights

GE: GE Aerospace's moderate Piotroski score of 5 and accrual-heavy earnings reflect a company in transition, where cash realization is lagging reported profitability amidst elevated 39.5% volatility and a recent 8.1% weekly decline.
HWM: HWM demonstrates exceptional fundamental quality with a 9/9 Piotroski score and negative accruals, justifying its significant 1-year return of 70.0% and its ability to trade near 52-week highs.

Quality Assessment

The portfolio presents a high-quality fundamental core led by Howmet's elite financial metrics, though the temporary lack of cash backing for earnings across both firms introduces a layer of accounting complexity. Investors should monitor whether GE can bridge the gap between its accrual-based earnings and actual cash generation as it stabilizes its standalone operations over the next 6-18 months.

Company OCF/NI FCF Margin Accruals Piotroski F
GE N/A 9.5% 0.01 5
HWM N/A 13.1% -0.01 9

Quality Assessment

The portfolio presents a high-quality fundamental core led by Howmet's elite financial metrics, though the temporary lack of cash backing for earnings across both firms introduces a layer of accounting complexity. Investors should monitor whether GE can bridge the gap between its accrual-based earnings and actual cash generation as it stabilizes its standalone operations over the next 6-18 months.

GE

GE Aerospace's moderate Piotroski score of 5 and accrual-heavy earnings reflect a company in transition, where cash realization is lagging reported profitability amidst elevated 39.5% volatility and a recent 8.1% weekly decline.

HWM

HWM demonstrates exceptional fundamental quality with a 9/9 Piotroski score and negative accruals, justifying its significant 1-year return of 70.0% and its ability to trade near 52-week highs.

3F Financial Overview Summary & Strategic Insights

The aerospace portfolio, comprised of GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace, demonstrates robust operational health characterized by an average TTM ROE of 35.9% and an impressive average ROIC of 24.8%. While HWM continues to outperform the S&P 500 with a 4.8% YTD return, GE has entered a period of technical consolidation, trading 11.7% below its 52-week high with a bearish RSI of 35. Despite this divergence, the portfolio's negative Cash Conversion Cycle (-28 days) and strong Piotroski F-Score of 7.0 underscore a foundation of high earnings quality and efficient capital management. Investors are currently navigating a high-valuation regime, reflected in an average EV/EBITDA of 35.8x, which demands sustained double-digit growth to justify current premiums.

Strengths

The portfolio’s core strength lies in its exceptional value creation, evidenced by a ROIC-WACC spread of 9.18% and an average TTM ROE of 35.9%. Efficiency is a hallmark of these operations; a negative Cash Conversion Cycle of -28 days indicates that these firms effectively use supplier credit to fund operations, providing a powerful liquidity advantage. Furthermore, the average Piotroski F-Score of 7.0/9 confirms that the fundamental financial health of these entities remains resilient, with 2/2 companies successfully creating economic value.

Concerns

GE’s recent technical breakdown is a significant concern, as the stock has underperformed the S&P 500 by 7.2% over the last month and is currently trading below its 50-day SMA with a bearish RSI of 35. While HWM shows more relative strength, both companies trade at demanding multiples (Avg EV/EBITDA 35.8x), leaving little room for operational errors. The elevated 20-day volatility across the portfolio suggests that investors should prepare for significant price swings as the market re-evaluates aerospace growth trajectories in a mild bull environment.

Opportunities

Upside potential is rooted in the structural supply-demand imbalance within the aerospace sector, where HWM's 12.4% 3-month return suggests it is successfully capturing current market momentum. GE’s current technical weakness may present a stabilization opportunity near its 200-day SMA, provided its 56.7% 1-year growth trajectory remains fundamentally intact.

Recommendations

Investors should prioritize monitoring GE’s ability to reclaim its 50-day moving average to confirm that the current bearish RSI is a temporary correction rather than a structural shift. Given the high EV/EBITDA multiples, focus should remain on HWM as it continues to outperform the broader index and maintains a neutral RSI of 54. We recommend maintaining a neutral stance on new capital allocation until GE's volatility (39.5%) subsides and the portfolio's average accruals ratio (0.014) remains low, ensuring continued high earnings quality.

Key Takeaways

  • Exceptional capital efficiency is evidenced by a -28 day CCC and a 24.8% TTM ROIC.
  • Performance divergence exists between HWM (+4.8% YTD) and GE (-4.6% YTD), requiring a bifurcated management approach.
  • Valuation risk is elevated with an average EV/EBITDA of 35.8x, necessitating strict adherence to double-digit growth targets.
  • Technical indicators for GE (RSI 35) suggest near-term caution is warranted despite long-term 'Golden Cross' support.